Cited by 95Communication in Education and HealthcareAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesStudent Stress and Coping

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Too Anxious to Talk: Social Anxiety, Academic Communication, and Students’ Experiences in Higher Education

Open access
Archbell, Kristen A., Coplan, Robert J.·2022·Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

Abstract

Social anxiety is related to a host of negative student outcomes in the educational context, including physical symptoms of anxiety, reduced cognitive functioning, and poor academic performance. Despite the prevalence of social anxiety, little is known about mechanisms that may underlie associations between social anxiety and outcomes in the context of higher education. Therefore, the goal of this study was to evaluate a conceptual model linking social anxiety, communication with peers and instructors, students’ experiences (i.e., engagement, connectedness, and satisfaction), and indices of socio-emotional functioning at university. Participants were 1,073 undergraduate students ( M age = 20.3 years, SD = 3.49) who completed a series of self-report measures. Among the results, social anxiety was negatively related to communication with instructors, socio-emotional functioning, and student experiences, and academic communication accounted for significant variance in the links between social anxiety and student experiences. In addition, there was at least some evidence that student experiences partially mediated the association between social anxiety and socio-emotional functioning. Gender effects suggest that social anxiety is related to less communication with instructors, lower engagement and satisfaction, and poorer socio-emotional functioning among females compared with males. Results are situated within current literature examining social anxiety in education. The discussion provides concrete suggestions for educational practitioners to increase support for students who experience social anxiety.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10634266211060079

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 95

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Archbell K., 2020, CURVE
  2. Barr R. B., 1996, Change Magazine, 13
  3. Crozier W. R., 2001, International handbook of social anxiety, 1
  4. Liebowitz M. R., 2003, Guidelines for using the Liebowitz social anxiety Version 5

Metadata

Authors
Archbell, K. A., & Coplan, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Carleton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Archbell, Kristen A.
Venue
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
Published
2021-12-30
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
273-286
ISSN
  • 1063-4266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4799
OpenAlex
W4200046468
Cited by
95
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
social anxiety, scholarly communication, student experience, social-emotional functioning, student engagement, student satisfaction, connectedness, peer-to-peer communication, gender differences, undergraduate students, mediation, student support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review