The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collision in Space
Abstract
On June 25, 1997, the Russian supply spacecraft Progress 234 collided with the Mir space station, rupturing Mir's pressure hull, throwing it into an uncontrolled attitude drift, and nearly forcing evacuation of the station. Like many high-profile accidents, this collision was the consequence of a chain of events leading to the final piloting errors that were its immediate cause. The discussion in this article does not resolve the relative contributions of the actions and decisions in this chain. Neither does it suggest corrective measures, many of which are straightforward and have already been implemented by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Russian Space Agency. Rather, its purpose is to identify the human factors that played a pervasive role in the incident. Workplace stress, fatigue, and sleep deprivation were identified by NASA as contributory factors in the Mir-Progress collision (Culbertson, 1997; NASA, forthcoming), but other contributing factors, such as requiring crew to perform difficult tasks for which their training is not current, could potentially become important factors in future situations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One example of sleep-related risks in space is the crash of the Progress space shuttle with Mir space station in 1997. The life-threatening accident occurred during a manual docking maneuver and fatigue was made out as one of the contributing factors19.”
From Effects of total sleep deprivation on performance in a manual spacecraft docking task (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control
Sheridan, T. B. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,949
Human speed perception is contrast dependent
Stone, L. S., & Thompson, P. (1992) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90209-2 · Cited by 334
A local mechanism for differential velocity detection
McKee, S. P. (1981) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(81)90095-x · Cited by 281
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 121
Controlled Flight into Terrain Accidents: System-Induced Errors
Wiener, E. L. (1977) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872087701900207 · Cited by 83
Shuttle-Mir's lessons for the International Space Station
Oberg, J. E. (1998) · IEEE Spectrum · doi:10.1109/6.681969 · Cited by 20
Portree, D. S. F. (2013) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 20
Evaluation of the '0.1 percent rule' for docking maneuvers
Brody, A. R. (1990) · Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets · doi:10.2514/3.26097 · Cited by 16
Brody, A. R. (1988) · NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) · Cited by 13
Visual display aid for orbital maneuvering - Design considerations
Grunwald, A. J., & Ellis, S. R. (1993) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/3.11438 · Cited by 8
Self-citationExtravehicular activity self-rescue using a hand-held thruster
Brody, A. R., Jacoby, R., & Ellis, S. R. (1992) · Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets · doi:10.2514/3.25540 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Burrough B. (1998b, November). Letter from space: All heaven in a rage. Vanity Fair, pp. 132ff.
- Culbertson F., 1997, Testimony before the Committee on Science
Cited by
Sorted by citations
White, R. J., & Averner, M. M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35059243 · Cited by 292
Buguet, A. (2007) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2007.06.040 · Cited by 120
la Torre, G. G. D., van Baarsen, B., Ferlazzo, F., Kanas, N., Weiss, K., Schneider, S., & Whiteley, I. (2012) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.08.013 · Cited by 125
Human missions to Mars: new psychological challenges and research issues
Manzey, D. (2004) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.013 · Cited by 115
Cognitive Neuroscience in Space
la Torre, G. G. D. (2014) · Life · doi:10.3390/life4030281 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Ames Research Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ellis, Stephen R.
- ORCID
- Ellis, Stephen R.
- Venue
- Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-9
- ISSN
- 1064-8046 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966023746
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ergonomics in Design The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Occupational Health and Safety Research
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- Mir space station, human factors, occupational stress, fatigue, sleep deprivation, crew training, chain of events
- MeSH terms
- Accidents, Aviation, Decision Making, Equipment Design, Humans, Ergonomics, Space Flight, Safety Management, Astronauts, Spacecraft
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
