Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level

Bimber, Bruce·2001·Political Research Quarterly

Abstract

Some aspects of democracy appear more sensitive than others to the availability throughout society of political information. Individual-level political engagement poses a puzzle in this regard. An instrumentalquantitative conception of information that is central to rational theories and is also found in some behavioral theories of participation appears contradicted by historical trends. I treat the contemporary expansion in political information made possible by new information technology as a form of natural experiment. I test for a relationship between information availability and political engagement using survey data about Internet use in the period 1996-99. This test is relevant to the applied debate over whether the information revolution will prove salutary for participation, and at the same time sheds light on contending theories of information. I find little relationship exists; the only form of participation which is demonstrably connected to Internet use is donating money This finding fails to support instrumental conceptions of information and instead endorses cognitive conceptions employed in psychological and certain behavioral theories of political engagement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/106591290105400103

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.2307/2111531 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ansolabehere, Stephen, 1995, Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate
  3. Bennett, Daniel, 1999, The Net Effect: How Cyberadvocacy is Changing the Political Landscape
  4. Berry, Jeffrey A., 1984, The Interest Group Society
  5. 10.2307/3235370 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1080/105846099198569 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bimber, Bruce, 2000, Social Science Quarterly, 18, 868
  8. Brainard, Lori A., annual meeting of the American Political Science Association
  9. Browning, Graeme, 1996, Electronic Democracy: Using the Internet to Influence Pol-
  10. 10.1080/105846097199218 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1177/107769907705400304 · DOI
  12. Cigler, Allan J., 1998, Interest Group Politics
  13. Converse, Philip E., 1972, The Human Meaning of Social Change, 263
  14. Davis, Richard, 1998, The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System
  15. Delli Carpini, 1996, What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters
  16. 10.1177/107769909407100217 · DOI
  17. Dertouzos, Michael, 1997, What Will Be: How the New Information Marketplace Will Change our Lives
  18. Downs, Anthony, 1957, An Economic Theory of Democracy
  19. Flanagin, William H., 1994, Political Behavior of the American Electorate
  20. Graber, Doris, 1984, Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide
  21. Graber, Doris, annual meeting of the American Poltical Science Association
  22. Grossman, Lawrence K., 1995, The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in America
  23. Gurak, Laura, 1997, Persuasion and Privacy in Cyberspace
  24. 10.1080/105846097199209 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/CBO9780511664113 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Johnson, Thomas J., 1998, Engaging the Public: How Government and the Media Can Reinvigorate American Democracy
  27. Kuklinksi, James H, 1991, American Political Science Review, 85, 1341, 10.2307/1963949 · DOI
  28. 10.2307/2960234 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Lodge, Milton, annual meeting of the American Political Science Association
  30. Luskin, Robert C., 1993, Controversies in Voting Behavior, 114
  31. 10.1080/10584609.1996.9963099 · DOI
  32. McPhee, William N., 1963, Formal Theories of Mass Behavior
  33. Morris, Dick, 2000, Vote.com
  34. Negroponte, Nicholas, 1995, Being Digital
  35. 10.1093/poq/40.1.115 · DOI
  36. Neuman, W Russell, 1986, The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate
  37. 10.7208/chicago/9780226161174.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Norris, Pippa, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association
  39. Patterson, Thomas E., 1980, The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President
  40. 10.7208/chicago/9780226772875.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Rosenstone, Steven J., 1993, Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America
  42. Sadow, Jeffrey D., delivery at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association
  43. Schudsen, Michael, 1998, The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life
  44. Selnow, Gary W, 1998, Electronic Whistle-Stops: The Impact of the Internet on American Politics
  45. Smith, Eric R. A. N., 1989, The Unchanging American Voter
  46. 10.1017/CBO9780511720468 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Teixeira, Ruy, 1987, Why Americans Don't Vote: Turnout Decline in the United States 1960-1984
  48. Verba, Sidney, 1995, Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politic, 10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Wolfinger, Raymond E., 1980, Who Votes?

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bimber, B.
Venue
Political Research Quarterly
Published
2001-03
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
53-67
ISSN
  • 1065-9129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-274X
OpenAlex
W2008676006
Cited by
528
References
2
FWCI
72.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/106591290105400103
The paper
Bimber, B. (2001). Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level. Political Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.