CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 106Career Development and DiversityHigher Education and EmployabilityStudent Stress and Coping

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation of Depression and Affectivity to Career Decision Status and Self-Efficacy in College Students

Rottinghaus, Patrick J., Jenkins, Nicholas, Jantzer, Amanda M.·2009·Journal of Career Assessment
DOI 10.1177/1069072708330463
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Further investigations are necessary to explore the interface between personal-emotional and career-related factors. The authors examined links between participants' emotional life, including depression and positive/negative affect, and career decision status and average level of vocationally relevant self-efficacy in a sample of 388 university students. Participants who had made a career decision were significantly less depressed, as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, than those who were undecided about their career. Furthermore, the authors found no significant difference in the average level of positive affect or negative affect, as measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, across career choice status groups. Gender accounted for 8.4% of the variation in overall average level of self efficacy, as measured by the Kuder Skills Assessment—College and Adult Version, and positive affect significantly contributed incremental variance (12.7%). The importance of addressing depression and affectivity in vocational research and practice is discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1069072708330463

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bandura, A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory
  2. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 1-43). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  3. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kashdan, T., 2007, Psychcritiques, 52, 2
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494 · DOI
  6. Rottinghaus, P.J., 2006, Kuder Skills Assessment: College and Adult Form
  7. Spokane, A.R., 1991, Career intervention
  8. World Health Organization., 2004, The World Health Report 2004: Changing History, Annex Table 3: Burden of disease in DALYs by cause, sex, and mortality stratum in WHO regions, estimates for 2002
  9. Zytowski, D.G., 2004, Kuder Career Search user manual
  10. Zytowski, D.G., 2007, Kuder Skills Assessment: Users manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rottinghaus, P. J., Jenkins, N., & Jantzer, A. M.
Affiliations
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
ORCID
Rottinghaus, Patrick J.
Venue
Journal of Career Assessment
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2009-07-22
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
271-285
ISSN
  • 1069-0727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4590
DOI
10.1177/1069072708330463
OpenAlex
W2041065363
Cited by
106
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Career Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
depression, positive affect, negative affect, career choice, self-efficacy, university students, vocational psychology, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review