The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human Performance in Cybersecurity: A Research Agenda
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of critical areas of human performance research required to support the development and deployment of effective cybersecurity systems. These areas include usability and security compliance, mitigation of human error and risk reduction, enhancement of situation awareness, and development of effective visualization tools and techniques. We describe the nature of the research and development efforts required to support effective human-centered design of cybersecurity systems and make specific recommendations for near-term work in this area.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“From a cybersecurity perspective, stakeholders who lack knowledge of cybersecurity systems and do not follow cybersecurity processes make systems vulnerable to cyber accidents (Boyce et al., 2011).”
From A BN driven FMEA approach to assess maritime cybersecurity risks (2023) · cites this paper as Boyce et al., 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A BN driven FMEA approach to assess maritime cybersecurity risks
Park, C., Kontovas, C., Yang, Z., & Chang, C.-H. (2023) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106480 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyce, M. W., Duma, K. M., Hettinger, L. J., Malone, T. B., Wilson, D. P., & Lockett-Reynolds, J.
- Affiliations
- United States Department of Homeland Security (US)
- Booz Allen Hamilton (United States) (US)
- Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety (US)
- ORCID
- Boyce, M. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-09-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1115-1119
- ISSN
- 0163-5182 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-9312
- OpenAlex
- W2081908994
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Keywords
- cybersecurity, human performance, human error, risk mitigation, situational awareness, visualization tools, usability, security compliance, human-centered design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
