Cited by 596Mental Health Research TopicsHealth and Well-being StudiesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Daily Inventory of Stressful Events: An Interview-Based Approach for Measuring Daily Stressors

Almeida, David M., Wethington, Elaine, Kessler, Ronald C.·2002·Assessment

Abstract

This study introduces the Daily Inventory of Stressful Events (DISE), an interview-based approach to the measurement of multiple aspects of daily stressors through daily telephone interviews. Using a U.S. national sample of adults aged 25 to 74 (N = 1,031), the prevalence as well as the affective and physical correlates of daily stressors are examined. Respondents had at least one daily stressor on 40 percent of the study days and multiple stressors on 11 percent of the study days. The most common class of stressors was interpersonal tension followed by work-related stressors for men and network stressors (events that occur to close others) for women. Stressors that involved danger of loss were more prevalent than stressors in which loss actually occurred. Regression analyses showed that specific types of daily stressors such as interpersonal tensions and network stressors were unique predictors of both health symptoms and mood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191102091006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 46 · Cited by 596

Authors
Almeida, D. M., Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Assessment
Published
2002-03
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
41-55
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W2084124728
Cited by
596
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG19293)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH19734)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
daily hassles, stress measurement, interpersonal tension, occupational stress, health symptoms, mood
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depression, Female, Health Status, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review