The German version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10): evaluation of dimensionality, validity, and measurement invariance with exploratory and confirmatory bifactor modeling
Open accessAbstract
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a popular instrument for measuring the degree to which individuals appraise situations in their lives as excessively uncontrollable and overloaded. Despite its widespread use (e.g., for evaluating intervention effects in stress management studies), there is still no agreement on its factor structure. Hence, the aim of the present study was to examine the dimensionality, measurement invariance (i.e., across gender, samples, and time), reliability, and validity of the PSS. Data from 11,939 German adults (73% women) were used to establish an exploratory bifactor model for the PSS with one general and two specific factors and to cross-validate this model in a confirmatory bifactor model. The model displayed strong measurement invariance across gender and was replicated in Study 2 in data derived from six randomized controlled trials investigating a web-based stress management training. In Study 2 (overall N = 1,862), we found strong temporal invariance. Also, our analyses of concurrent and predictive validity showed associations with depressive symptoms, anxiety, and insomnia severity for the three latent PSS factors. These results show the implications of the bifactor structure of the PSS that might be of consequence in empirical research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The German PSS-10 has good reliability (ω=0.89).
“The German PSS-10 has a good reliability of ω=0.89.73”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 127
- Authors
- Reis, D., Lehr, D., Heber, E., & Ebert, D. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
- Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Reis, Dorota
- Venue
- Assessment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-06-18
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1246-1259
- ISSN
- 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3489
- OpenAlex
- W2691726596
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nbn-resolving.org
- Locations
- Assessment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
- OPUS Repository (Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund Berlin-Brandenburg) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Commission (2007DE161PR001, CCI 2007DE161PR001)
- European Regional Development Fund (CCI 2007DE161PR001, 2007DE161PR001)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- Perceived Stress Scale, PSS-10, perceived stress, German translation, bifactor model, measurement invariance, factor structure, psychometric validation, depressive symptoms, anxiety, insomnia, time invariance, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Young Adult, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review