Cited by 127Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

The German version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10): evaluation of dimensionality, validity, and measurement invariance with exploratory and confirmatory bifactor modeling

Open access
Reis, Dorota, Lehr, Dirk, Heber, Elena, Ebert, David Daniel·2019·Assessment

Abstract

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a popular instrument for measuring the degree to which individuals appraise situations in their lives as excessively uncontrollable and overloaded. Despite its widespread use (e.g., for evaluating intervention effects in stress management studies), there is still no agreement on its factor structure. Hence, the aim of the present study was to examine the dimensionality, measurement invariance (i.e., across gender, samples, and time), reliability, and validity of the PSS. Data from 11,939 German adults (73% women) were used to establish an exploratory bifactor model for the PSS with one general and two specific factors and to cross-validate this model in a confirmatory bifactor model. The model displayed strong measurement invariance across gender and was replicated in Study 2 in data derived from six randomized controlled trials investigating a web-based stress management training. In Study 2 (overall N = 1,862), we found strong temporal invariance. Also, our analyses of concurrent and predictive validity showed associations with depressive symptoms, anxiety, and insomnia severity for the three latent PSS factors. These results show the implications of the bifactor structure of the PSS that might be of consequence in empirical research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191117715731

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 127

Authors
Reis, D., Lehr, D., Heber, E., & Ebert, D. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Reis, Dorota
Venue
Assessment
Published
2017-06-18
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1246-1259
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W2691726596
Cited by
127
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS Repository (Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund Berlin-Brandenburg) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (2007DE161PR001, CCI 2007DE161PR001)
  • European Regional Development Fund (CCI 2007DE161PR001, 2007DE161PR001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
Perceived Stress Scale, PSS-10, perceived stress, German translation, bifactor model, measurement invariance, factor structure, psychometric validation, depressive symptoms, anxiety, insomnia, time invariance, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review