Examining the Structural and External Validity of the Adult Concentration Inventory for Assessing Sluggish Cognitive Tempo in Adults
Abstract
The Adult Concentration Inventory (ACI) is an adult self-report measure of sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) developed following a meta-analysis identifying items distinguishing SCT from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) inattention. To date, only one study conducted in college students has examined the structural and external validity of the ACI. The current study evaluated the convergent and discriminative validity of the ACI in a community sample of adults, in addition to testing unique associations with internalizing symptoms, daily life executive functions, and sleep. Adults ( N = 286; M age = 44.45; 83.6% female) completed ratings of SCT, ADHD symptom dimensions, and external correlates. An a priori two-factor model with cross-loadings found 10 of the 16 SCT items to have high loadings on the SCT factor and low loadings on the ADHD inattention factor. SCT was uniquely associated with higher internalizing symptoms, time management and self-organization difficulties, poorer sleep quality, shorter sleep duration, lower sleep efficiency, and more daytime sleepiness. These findings replicate and extend support for the ACI in assessing SCT in adults.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In prior studies of adults with ADHD and SCT, SCT was associated with global EF deficits.
“In the few prior studies of adults with ADHD + SCT, SCT was associated with EF deficits in problem-solving and organization (9, 10) and in global EF (1, 2, 9–13).”
From Characteristics of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo among adults with ADHD: objective neurocognitive measures align with self-report of executive function (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Fredrick, J. W., Burns, G. L., Langberg, J. M., & Becker, S. P.
- Affiliations
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fredrick, Joseph W.
- Venue
- Assessment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-07-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1742-1755
- ISSN
- 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3489
- OpenAlex
- W3179855527
- Semantic Scholar
- 3b2fb3cc9a185b6ef605a592eed827d700229583
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute of Education Sciences (R305A160126)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- sluggish cognitive tempo, convergent validity, discriminant validity, factor structure, internalizing problems, executive function, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, adults
- MeSH terms
- Sluggish Cognitive Tempo, Adult, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review