Cited by 2,600Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesComplex Network Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Small-World Brain Networks

Bassett, Danielle Smith, Bullmore, Ed·2006·The Neuroscientist

Abstract

Many complex networks have a small-world topology characterized by dense local clustering or cliquishness of connections between neighboring nodes yet a short path length between any (distant) pair of nodes due to the existence of relatively few long-range connections. This is an attractive model for the organization of brain anatomical and functional networks because a small-world topology can support both segregated/specialized and distributed/integrated information processing. Moreover, small-world networks are economical, tending to minimize wiring costs while supporting high dynamical complexity. The authors introduce some of the key mathematical concepts in graph theory required for small-world analysis and review how these methods have been applied to quantification of cortical connectivity matrices derived from anatomical tract-tracing studies in the macaque monkey and the cat. The evolution of small-world networks is discussed in terms of a selection pressure to deliver cost-effective information-processing systems. The authors illustrate how these techniques and concepts are increasingly being applied to the analysis of human brain functional networks derived from electroencephalography/magnetoencephalography and fMRI experiments. Finally, the authors consider the relevance of small-world models for understanding the emergence of complex behaviors and the resilience of brain systems to pathological attack by disease or aberrant development. They conclude that small-world models provide a powerful and versatile approach to understanding the structure and function of human brain systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073858406293182

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A fundamental property of brain networks-either structural or functional-is that they demonstrate clear small-world characteristics; that is, they are simultaneously segregated (high clustering coefficient) and integrated (short path lengths).

    “A fundamental property of brain networks-either structural or functional-is that they demonstrate clear small-world characteristics; that is, they are simultaneously segregated (high clustering coefficient) and integrated (short path lengths).10,87,103”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 68 · Cited by 2,600

Authors
Bassett, D. S., & Bullmore, E.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Brain Mapping Unit, University of Cambridge, Department of Psychiatry, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom,
Venue
The Neuroscientist
Published
2006-12
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
512-523
ISSN
  • 1073-8584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4098
OpenAlex
W1979426401
Cited by
2,600
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 152 · 2022: 153 · 2021: 174 · 2020: 205 · 2019: 203 · 2018: 164 · 2017: 170 · 2016: 169 · 2015: 142 · 2014: 130 · 2013: 149 · 2012: 122
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Neuroscientist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
small-world networks, brain networks, cortical connectivity, graph theory, wiring cost, functional brain networks, macaque, cats, EEG, MEG, functional MRI, network evolution, network resilience, complex behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review