Small-World Brain Networks
Abstract
Many complex networks have a small-world topology characterized by dense local clustering or cliquishness of connections between neighboring nodes yet a short path length between any (distant) pair of nodes due to the existence of relatively few long-range connections. This is an attractive model for the organization of brain anatomical and functional networks because a small-world topology can support both segregated/specialized and distributed/integrated information processing. Moreover, small-world networks are economical, tending to minimize wiring costs while supporting high dynamical complexity. The authors introduce some of the key mathematical concepts in graph theory required for small-world analysis and review how these methods have been applied to quantification of cortical connectivity matrices derived from anatomical tract-tracing studies in the macaque monkey and the cat. The evolution of small-world networks is discussed in terms of a selection pressure to deliver cost-effective information-processing systems. The authors illustrate how these techniques and concepts are increasingly being applied to the analysis of human brain functional networks derived from electroencephalography/magnetoencephalography and fMRI experiments. Finally, the authors consider the relevance of small-world models for understanding the emergence of complex behaviors and the resilience of brain systems to pathological attack by disease or aberrant development. They conclude that small-world models provide a powerful and versatile approach to understanding the structure and function of human brain systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A fundamental property of brain networks-either structural or functional-is that they demonstrate clear small-world characteristics; that is, they are simultaneously segregated (high clustering coefficient) and integrated (short path lengths).
“A fundamental property of brain networks-either structural or functional-is that they demonstrate clear small-world characteristics; that is, they are simultaneously segregated (high clustering coefficient) and integrated (short path lengths).10,87,103”
From Graph theory analysis of complex brain networks: new concepts in brain mapping applied to neurosurgery (2016) · cites this paper as [10]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 68 · Cited by 2,600
- Authors
- Bassett, D. S., & Bullmore, E.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Brain Mapping Unit, University of Cambridge, Department of Psychiatry, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom,
- Venue
- The Neuroscientist
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 512-523
- ISSN
- 1073-8584 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4098
- OpenAlex
- W1979426401
- Cited by
- 2,600
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 84 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 152 · 2022: 153 · 2021: 174 · 2020: 205 · 2019: 203 · 2018: 164 · 2017: 170 · 2016: 169 · 2015: 142 · 2014: 130 · 2013: 149 · 2012: 122
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Neuroscientist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- small-world networks, brain networks, cortical connectivity, graph theory, wiring cost, functional brain networks, macaque, cats, EEG, MEG, functional MRI, network evolution, network resilience, complex behavior
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review