Protective Autoimmunity: A Unifying Model for the Immune Network Involved in CNS Repair
Abstract
Immune activity in the CNS parenchyma under various acute and chronic neurodegenerative conditions has been often interpreted as a sign of pathological inflammation. The apparent resemblance of the local neuroinflammatory processes to autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), generated the view that, despite differences in etiology and pathology, neurodegenerative disorders with a local inflammatory component can benefit from systemic anti-inflammatory therapy. In addition, as CNS self-reactive T cells are associated with the etiology of MS, autoimmunity was assumed to solely reflect pathology, and therefore, was universally linked to autoimmune disease. Yet, it is becoming increasingly clear that CNS-specific T cells, along with circulating and local innate immune cells, can enhance CNS healing processes following non-infectious injuries, or any deviation from homeostasis, including chronic pathological conditions. Here, we discuss the theory of “protective autoimmunity,” which describes the activity of an immune cell network encompassing effector and regulatory T cells with specificity for CNS antigens, in CNS maintenance and repair. Such an immune network, evoked in response to external and internal threats, functions in a tightly regulated way, ensuring restoration of the brain’s equilibrium and return to homeostasis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peripheral immune cells, including self-reactive T cells, are important for homeostasis of CNS.
“Actually, peripheral immune cells, even including the self-reactive T cells, have been found to be important for the homeostasis of CNS.97”
From Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development (2023) · cites this paper as [97]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 132 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Schwartz, M., & Raposo, C.
- Affiliations
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
- Venue
- The Neuroscientist
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-01-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 343-358
- ISSN
- 1073-8584 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-4098
- OpenAlex
- W2029409356
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Neuroscientist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Keywords
- neuroinflammation, neurodegenerative diseases, multiple sclerosis, regulatory T cells, effector T cells, CNS repair, immune homeostasis, anti-inflammatory therapy, innate immune cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review