An Approach to Factor Assays in Patients with Strong Lupus Anticoagulants
Abstract
Higb-titer lupus anticoqgulants (LACs) may present technical and diagnostic dffficulties in the evaluation of patients with specific factor deficiencies or inhibitors. These potent LACS, although infrequently encountered, may be very confusing because they do not generate the characteristic pattern of rising factor levels with increasing sample dilutions. In addition, they may prevent assessment of individual factor defects by lowering activities below detectable or evaluable levels (<1%). To help resolve these problems, our taboratory has developed an approach that incorporates a variation of the platelet neutralization procedure (PNP), wherein we add phospholipid (PL) to adsorb the LAC in each of the dilutions of the individual factor assays. Using factor VIII for the prototypic studies, we characterized three basic result patterns that might arise, depending on the amount of factor activity recovered. As observed in patients exhibiting two of these patterns, an appreciable increase in activity agrees with the neutralization of a LAC and provides evidence against a coexistent severe deficiency of that factor and presumptive evidence against a coexistent, strong specific factor inhibitor. Key .Words: Lupus anticoagulants-Factor assays-Factor inhibitors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other coagulation assays that use aPTT-based methods may show interference due to LA presence, resulting in falsely low factor activity.
“Other coagulation assays that use aPTT-based methods, as one stage measurement (OSA) [90] for factors VIII, IX, XI, and XII, may show interference due to LA presence, resulting in falsely low factor activity [91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98].”
From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [98]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass
Molinari, A. C., Martini, T., Banov, L., Ierardi, A., Leotta, M., Strangio, A., & Santoro, R. C. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12206654 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Other coagulation assays that use aPTT-based methods, as one stage measurement (OSA) [90] for factors VIII, IX, XI, and XII, may show interference due to LA presence, resulting in falsely low factor activity [91–98].”
Method
- Authors
- Armitage, J., Ashcraft, J., Kim, A., & Kaplan, H. S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Parkland Memorial Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Kim, Anne
- Venue
- Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-130
- ISSN
- 1076-0296 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2150853073
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hemophilia Treatment and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Keywords
- lupus anticoagulant, factor inhibitors, factor VIII, phospholipid adsorption, factor deficiency, assay interference, coagulation factor activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review