The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use, Quality, and Outcomes of Care for Mental Health: The Rural Perspective
Abstract
This review synthesizes empirical research in rural mental health services to identify current research priorities to improve the mental health of rural Americans. Using a conceptual framework of the multiple determinants of use, quality, and outcomes, the authors address (1) how key constructs are operationalized, (2) their theoretical influence on the care process, (3) reported differences for nonmetropolitan and metropolitan individuals or within nonmetropolitan individuals, (4) salient issues rural advocates have raised, and (5) key research questions. While the authors recognize that rurality is a useful political umbrella to organize advocacy efforts, they propose that investigators no longer employ any of the multiple definitions of the term in the literature as even intrarural comparisons have not provided compelling evidence about the underlying causes of observed outcomes differences. Until these underlying causes have been identified, it is difficult to determine which components of the nonmetropolitan service system need to be improved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why People Use Health Services
Rosenstock, I. M. (1966) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3348967 · Cited by 2,305
A Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Treatment of Depression in Primary Care
Katon, W. (1996) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830100072009 · Cited by 835
The Course of Depression in Adult Outpatients: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study
Wells, K. B. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100032007 · Cited by 475
Cited by
Wang, P. S., Lane, M., Olfson, M., Pincus, H. A., Wells, K. B., & Kessler, R. C. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.629 · Cited by 2,695
Prevalence and Treatment of Mental Disorders, 1990 to 2003
Kessler, R. C., Demler, O., Frank, R. G., Olfson, M., Pincus, H. A., Walters, E. E., Wang, P., Wells, K. B., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa043266 · Cited by 1,910
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults
Olthuis, J. V., Watt, M. C., Bailey, K., Hayden, J. A., & Stewart, S. H. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011565.pub2 · Cited by 390
Widening Rural-Urban Disparities in Youth Suicides, United States, 1996-2010
Fontanella, C. A., Hiance-Steelesmith, D. L., Phillips, G. S., Bridge, J. A., Lester, N., Sweeney, H. A., & Campo, J. V. (2015) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3561 · Cited by 375
A randomized trial of telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression
Fortney, J. C., Pyne, J. M., Edlund, M. J., Williams, D. K., Robinson, D. E., Mittal, D., & Henderson, K. L. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0201-9 · Cited by 315
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rost, K., Fortney, J., Fischer, E., & Smith, J.
- Venue
- Medical Care Research and Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 231-265
- ISSN
- 1077-5587 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6801
- OpenAlex
- W1982031448
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use, Quality, and Outcomes of Care for Mental Health: The Rural Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1077558702059003001
- The paper
- Rost, K., Fortney, J., Fischer, E., & Smith, J. (2002). Use, Quality, and Outcomes of Care for Mental Health: The Rural Perspective. Medical Care Research and Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558702059003001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.