The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Access to Health Care and Hospitalization for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions
Abstract
Hospitalization for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSH) is an accepted indicator of access to health care and avoidable morbidity. Accessible care of reasonable quality should reduce ACSH. Little research has examined the indicator’s external validity. We calculated standardized ACSH rates for 32 areas of Victoria, Australia (population 4.4 million). A representative survey measured access, disease prevalence, propensity to seek care, disease burden, social determinants of health services use, and behavioral risk factors. Regression analyses compared self-rated access with ACSH rates. Independent of prevalence, propensity to seek care, disease burden, and physician supply, better access was associated with lower ACSH rates. Results provide support for the ACSH indicator. When rural residence was considered, the covariate measuring access was not significant. However, rural residence also may contribute importantly to access. Results suggest both the complexity of the meaning of access and the desirability of further research to validate the ACSH indicator.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases
DEYO, R. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8 · Cited by 10,452
Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes
(2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052187 · Cited by 5,138
Kushner (2021) · doi:10.12788/jfp · Cited by 3,799
Naylor, M. D., Brooten, D., Campbell, R., Jacobsen, B. S., Mezey, M. D., Pauly, M. V., & Schwartz, J. S. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.7.613 · Cited by 1,831
Transitional Care of Older Adults Hospitalized with Heart Failure: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Naylor, M. D., Brooten, D. A., Campbell, R. L., Maislin, G., McCauley, K. M., & Schwartz, J. S. (2004) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52202.x · Cited by 1,365
Cited by
Alfradique, M. E., Bonolo, P. D. F., Dourado, I., Lima-Costa, M. F., Macinko, J., Mendonça, C. S., Oliveira, V. B., Sampaio, L. F. R., Simoni, C. D., & Turci, M. A. (2009) · Cadernos de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/s0102-311x2009000600016 · Cited by 334
Collins, J., Ward, B. M., Snow, P., Kippen, S., & Judd, F. (2017) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315625195 · Cited by 58
Shah, M. N., Wasserman, E. B., Gillespie, S. M., Wood, N. E., Wang, H., Noyes, K., Nelson, D., Dozier, A., & McConnochie, K. M. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.07.009 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Ansari, Z., Laditka, J. N., & Laditka, S. B.
- Venue
- Medical Care Research and Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 719-741
- ISSN
- 1077-5587 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6801
- OpenAlex
- W2124575740
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Access to Health Care and Hospitalization for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1077558706293637
- The paper
- Ansari, Z., Laditka, J. N., & Laditka, S. B. (2006). Access to Health Care and Hospitalization for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions. Medical Care Research and Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558706293637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
