The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of Implementation Effectiveness: Adapting a Framework for Complex Innovations
Abstract
Many innovations in the health sector are complex, requiring coordinated use by multiple organizational members to achieve benefits. Often, complex innovations are adopted with great anticipation only to fail during implementation. The health services literature provides limited conceptual guidance to researchers and practitioners about implementation of complex innovations. In the present study, we adapt an organizational framework of innovation implementation developed and validated in a manufacturing setting and explore the extent to which it aptly characterizes implementation in health sector organizations. Through comparative case studies of four cancer clinical research networks, we illustrate how this conceptual framework captures key determinants of the implementation of new programs in cancer prevention and control (CP/C) research and helps explain observed differences in implementation effectiveness. Key determinants include management support and innovation-values fit, which contribute to an organizational “climate” for implementation. We explore the implications for researchers and managers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations
GREENHALGH, T., ROBERT, G., MACFARLANE, F., BATE, P., & KYRIAKIDOU, O. (2004) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00325.x · Cited by 7,448
The Challenge of Innovation Implementation
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259164 · Cited by 2,113
Implementing computerized technology: An organizational analysis.
Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.811 · Cited by 615
Cited by
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · Cited by 14,496
Clarity out of chaos: Use of theory in implementation research
Damschroder, L. J. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.036 · Cited by 422
Li, S.-A., Jeffs, L., Barwick, M., & Stevens, B. (2018) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-018-0734-5 · Cited by 433
Moullin, J. C., Sabater-Hernández, D., Fernandez-Llimos, F., & Benrimoj, S. I. (2015) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0005-z · Cited by 392
A Guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation
Stetler, C. B., Damschroder, L. J., Helfrich, C. D., & Hagedorn, H. J. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-99 · Cited by 402
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Helfrich, C. D., Weiner, B. J., McKinney, M. M., & Minasian, L.
- Venue
- Medical Care Research and Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-303
- ISSN
- 1077-5587 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6801
- OpenAlex
- W2025282668
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Implementation Effectiveness: Adapting a Framework for Complex Innovations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1077558707299887
- The paper
- Helfrich, C. D., Weiner, B. J., McKinney, M. M., & Minasian, L. (2007). Determinants of Implementation Effectiveness: Adapting a Framework for Complex Innovations. Medical Care Research and Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558707299887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
