Developing a News Media Literacy Scale
Abstract
Using a framework previously applied to other areas of media literacy, this study developed and assessed a measurement scale focused specifically on critical news media literacy. Our scale appears to successfully measure news media literacy as we have conceptualized it based on previous research, demonstrated through assessments of content, construct, and predictive validity. Among our college student sample, a separate media system knowledge index also was a significant predictor of knowledge about topics in the news, which suggests the need for a broader framework. Implications for future work in defining and assessing news media literacy are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Each possible goal of media literacy implies a different method of evaluation.
“Each possible goal implies a different method of evaluation (Bulger, 2012; Ashley, Maksl, Craft, 2013).”
From The Promises, Challenges, and Futures of Media Literacy (2018) · cites this paper as Ashley, Maksl, Craft, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 227
- Authors
- Ashley, S., Maksl, A., & Craft, S.
- Affiliations
- Boise State University (US)
- Indiana University Southeast (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Venue
- Journalism & Mass Communication Educator
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-01-02
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-21
- ISSN
- 0022-5517 (ISSN-L)
- 1077-6958
- 2161-4326
- OpenAlex
- W2167321794
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 117.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journalism & Mass Communication Educator (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Keywords
- news media literacy, scale development, scale validation, construct validity, predictive validity, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review