The DOI matches its Crossref record.
That Rare Feeling: Re-presenting Research Through Poetic Transcription
Abstract
This article explores an experimental form of writing that I'm terming poetic transcription. Inspired by Laurel Richardson (1992, 1994a, 1994b), I define poetic transcription as the creation of poemlike compositions from the words of interviewees. In this article, I present six poetic transcriptions of Dona Juana, an elderly Puerto Rican researcher and educator; describe my poetic transcription process; and examine issues that experimental writing—specifically, poetic transcription—raises for research re-presentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
“Poem is What?” Poetic Inquiry in Qualitative Social Science Research
Prendergast, M. (2009) · International Review of Qualitative Research · doi:10.1525/irqr.2009.1.4.541 · Cited by 203
Found Poetry as Literature Review: Research Poems on Audience and Performance
Prendergast, M. (2006) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800405284601 · Cited by 126
Echoes in Translation: Reassembling Teacher Voice Through Poetic Inquiry
Le, T. T., & Pham, T. T. (2026) · International Journal of Education and the Arts · doi:10.59236/ijea27n22
Metadata
- Authors
- Glesne, C.
- Venue
- Qualitative Inquiry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-221
- ISSN
- 1077-8004 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7565
- OpenAlex
- W1997626480
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
