White Privilege, Color Blindness, and Services to Battered Women
Abstract
White privilege is a system of benefits, advantages, and opportunities experienced by White persons in our society simply because of their skin color. In this article, the authors present the results of a descriptive, exploratory study of White privilege in battered women’s shelters in the Deep South. Based on a qualitative analysis, the authors show how White privilege is intricately connected to executive directors’ claims of color blindness, the othering of women of color, and viewing White as the norm. The authors conclude the article with implications for service provision to battered women and directions for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 126
- Authors
- Donnelly, D. A., Cook, K. J., van Ausdale, D., & Foley, L.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- University of Southern Maine (US)
- Syracuse University
- University of Tulsa (US)
- Venue
- Violence Against Women
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-37
- ISSN
- 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8448
- OpenAlex
- W2164209016
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Keywords
- white privilege, color vision deficiency, battered women, women's shelters, executive directors, women of color, othering, service delivery, Deep South
- MeSH terms
- Alabama, Attitude of Health Personnel, Black or African American, Female, Georgia, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Health Services Research, Humans, Mississippi, Surveys and Questionnaires, Women's Health Services, Women's Health, Battered Women, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review