Cited by 408Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Barriers to Domestic Violence Help Seeking: Implications for Intervention

Fugate, Michelle, Landis, Leslie, Riordan, Kim, Naureckas, Sara, Engel, Barbara·2005·Violence Against Women

Abstract

Data were obtained from the Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study, in which 491 abused women were interviewed in public health centers and a hospital. Responses of a subgroup of these women who did not seek help through the identified interventions are examined. Common themes emerge across the help-seeking interventions studied: individual thresholds for the seriousness of the violence, a perceived requirement to end the relationship, and certain specific barriers. The responses provide a glimpse into abused women’s reasons for not seeking particular interventions. Implications for public health, mental health, domestic violence counseling agencies, and the police are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077801204271959

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. American Medical Association., 1992, Diagnostic and treatment guidelines on domestic violence
  2. Block, C. R., 2000, The Chicago Women’s Health Risk Project: Report to the National Institute of Justice
  3. Donato, K. M., 1984, International Journal of Women’s Studies, 7, 99
  4. Edleson, J. L., 1997, Evaluating domestic violence programs
  5. Home, A., 1991, Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 3, 150
  6. Landis, L., 1997, Mayor Richard M. Daley’s Domestic Violence Advocacy Coordinating Council report: Assessment of the current response to domestic violence in Chicago
  7. Lerner, C. F., 6th International Family Violence Research Conference
  8. Murray, S. B., 1988, NWSA Journal, 1, 75
  9. Robinson, S., 2000, News Tribune
  10. 10.1037/e300342003-001 · DOI
  11. Young, K., 1998, Office of the Status of Women

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 406

Metadata

Authors
Fugate, M., Landis, L., Riordan, K., Naureckas, S., & Engel, B.
Affiliations
  • City of Chicago (US)
  • Field Foundation (US)
  • Erie Family Health Center (US)
  • Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority (US)
Venue
Violence Against Women
Published
2005-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
290-310
ISSN
  • 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8448
OpenAlex
W2122882139
Cited by
408
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
13.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
domestic violence, help-seeking barriers, battered women, help-seeking interventions, breakup, public health centers, police response to domestic violence
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Chicago, Communication Barriers, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Professional-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Spouse Abuse, Women's Health, Risk Assessment, Battered Women, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review