Cited by 49Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentIntimate Partner and Family ViolencePosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Intimate Partner Stalking Victimization and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Post-Abuse Women

Fleming, Kimberly N., Newton, Tamara L., Fernandez-Botran, Rafael, Miller, James J., Burns, Vicki Ellison·2012·Violence Against Women

Abstract

This study aimed to further understanding of intimate partner stalking victimization in post-abuse women, with particular attention to the definition of stalking (with or without fear and threat) most predictive of posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms. In community midlife women with histories of divorce (N = 192), a history of stalking victimization accompanied by fear and threat was positively correlated with PTS symptom severity, after accounting for other partner abuse. The presence, compared with absence, of fear-and-threat stalking history doubled the odds of symptomatic levels of hyperarousal. Greater physical assault and injury chronicity differentiated fear-and-threat stalked women from other stalked women. Stalking contributed to a fuller understanding of PTS symptoms in women, showing particular relevance for hyperarousal.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077801212474447

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A history of stalking is associated with increased severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms, even after controlling for partner abuse.

    “A history of stalking is associated with increased severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms, even after controlling for partner abuse (Fleming et al., 2012).”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Fleming et al., 2012

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 49

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  2. Anastasi A., 1988, Psychological testing
  3. Babyak M. A., 2004, Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 411
  4. 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048954.50232.d8 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.028 · DOI
  6. Baum K., 2009, Stalking victimization in the United States
  7. 10.1891/0886-6708.15.4.389 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0886260502017001004 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/1077801207305933 · DOI
  10. Cohen J., 2003, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
  11. 10.1891/0886-6708.20.6.625 · DOI
  12. 10.1891/vivi.17.4.429.33682 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/1077801207302698 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.avb.2010.12.004 · DOI
  15. 10.1023/A:1022079418229 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1177/0886260507306499 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.165 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s10896-011-9383-3 · DOI
  19. 10.2307/2529310 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1177/1077801211404548 · DOI
  21. 10.1891/088667007782793147 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/1077801206292679 · DOI
  23. 10.1891/0886-6708.24.6.707 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mechanic M. B., 2002, Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators, 31
  25. 10.1177/1077801208319283 · DOI
  26. Mertin P., 2001, Violence and Victims, 16, 645
  27. National Criminal Justice Association, Project to develop a model anti-stalking code for states
  28. 10.1089/jwh.2011.2788 · DOI
  29. 10.1192/bjp.170.1.12 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00103.x · DOI
  31. Resnick H., 1996, Measurement of stress, trauma, and adaptation
  32. 10.1037/0021-843X.111.4.637 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/occmed/51.4.287 · DOI
  34. Straus M. A., 1999, Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families
  35. Straus M. A., 2003, The Conflict Tactics Scales handbook
  36. Tjaden P., 1998, Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey
  37. 10.1037/e300342003-001 · DOI
  38. Tjaden P., 2002, Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators, 9
  39. 10.1016/S0163-8343(02)00203-7 · DOI
  40. Weathers F., 1993, Paper presented at the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies

Metadata

Authors
Fleming, K. N., Newton, T. L., Fernandez-Botran, R., Miller, J. J., & Burns, V. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
  • Bellarmine University (US)
Venue
Violence Against Women
Published
2012-12
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
1368-1389
ISSN
  • 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8448
OpenAlex
W2115296412
Cited by
49
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R21AG024902)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
intimate partner stalking, posttraumatic stress symptoms, hyperarousal, physical assault, divorce, middle-aged women, partner abuse
MeSH terms
Arousal, Divorce, Fear, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Spouse Abuse, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Violence, Wounds and Injuries, Battered Women, Crime Victims, Stalking, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review