Cited by 29Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGun Ownership and Violence Research

Place, Injury Patterns, and Female-Victim Intimate Partner Homicide

Reckdenwald, Amy, Szalewski, Alec, Yohros, Alexis·2019·Violence Against Women

Abstract

Research demonstrates place matters in the study of intimate partner violence (IPV) and intimate partner homicide (IPH) with rural women experiencing more severe IPV and a higher risk of IPH. In addition, research points to variations in injury patterns with intimates characterized by more wounds and facial injuries. Little is known whether injury for female IPH victims differs across place; however, research suggests that abuse is a product of a larger social context. Using data from the National Violent Death Reporting System, results indicate that some variations exist based on degree of urbanicity of the county in which the IPH occurred.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077801218797467

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has documented the unique barriers faced by rural women that make it particularly difficult to deal with IPV, including public visibility, lack of privacy, few appropriate local support services and perceived lack of options for staying safe, concurrent with increased risk of homicide from their abusive partners.

    “research has documented the unique barriers faced by rural women that make it particularly difficult to deal with IPV, including public visibility, lack of privacy, few appropriate local support services and perceived lack of options for staying safe [73–75], concurrent with increased risk of homicide from their abusive partners [75, 76].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 29

Authors
Reckdenwald, A., Szalewski, A., & Yohros, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Reckdenwald, Amy
Venue
Violence Against Women
Published
2018-09-21
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
654-676
ISSN
  • 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8448
OpenAlex
W2890650972
Cited by
29
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Keywords
intimate partner homicide, intimate partner violence, women victims, injury patterns, place, urbanicity, rural women, facial trauma, National Violent Death Reporting System
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adult, Alaska, California, Cause of Death, Colorado, Female, Georgia, Homicide, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Population Surveillance, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin, Wounds and Injuries, Logistic Models, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review