CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceCrime Patterns and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fraternity Membership, Rape Myths, and Sexual Aggression on a College Campus

SCHWARTZ, MARTIN D., NOGRADY, CAROL A.·1996·Violence Against Women
DOI 10.1177/1077801296002002003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A rich theoretical and ethnographic literature exists suggesting that fraternity men are particularly prone to be sexual victimizers of women on college campuses. Yet, there is thin empirical evidence for this contention. Here, in a sample from a large midwestern university, there was strong evidence uncovered that male peer support for victimization of women exists, and that it is related to extensive alcohol use. However, there is no evidence that fraternity men are different on these factors from other men. A conclusion is that anti-rape efforts must be broader than only targeting fraternities, and that alcohol education must be a high priority.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077801296002002003

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Boumil, M. M., Date rape: The secret epidemic
  2. Burt, M. R., 1980, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 211, 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.211 · DOI
  3. Burt, M. R., 1981, Victimology, 6, 15
  4. Estrich, S., Real rape
  5. Gilbert, N., 1991, The Public Interest, 103, 54
  6. Gilmartin-Zena, P., 1987, Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 15, 175
  7. Kanin, E., 1984, Victimology, 11, 95
  8. 10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.795 · DOI
  10. Muehlenhard, C., 1987, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 20
  11. Sanday, P. R., Fraternity gang rape
  12. Schaeffer, A., 1993, Journal of College Student Development, 34, 175
  13. Warshaw, R., I never called it rape
  14. Weis, K., 1973, Issues in Criminology, 8, 71

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 109

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
SCHWARTZ, M. D., & NOGRADY, C. A.
Affiliations
Ohio University (US)
Venue
Violence Against Women
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1996-06
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
148-162
ISSN
  • 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8448
DOI
10.1177/1077801296002002003
OpenAlex
W2145236184
Cited by
109
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
fraternities, rape myths, sexual aggression, sexual victimization, university students, alcohol consumption, alcohol education
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Americas, Behavior, Communication, Crime, Data Collection, Education, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Men, North America, Peer Group, Rape, Research, Sampling Studies, Schools, Sexual Behavior, Sex Offenses, Social Problems, Students, United States, Universities, Women, Developed Countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review