Cited by 38Management and Marketing EducationHigher Education and EmployabilityWriting and Handwriting Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing and Enhancing the Basic Writing Skills of Marketing Students

Bacon, Donald R., Anderson, Elizabeth Scott·2004·Business Communication Quarterly

Abstract

Employers consistently rank communication skills, in particular writing ability, among the most important skills for undergraduate business students to possess. However, improving writing skills, especially with respect to punctuation, grammar, and word choice, often requires substantial teacher time and effort. To assess and improve student writing skills in a time-efficient manner, the authors developed a computer-scored measure of students’ ability to edit for writing mechanics. The authors tested the method with a pretest and posttest design and found that when students were held accountable for improvement (with 5% of the course grade dependent on improvement), there was a significant increase in students’ ability to edit. Without that accountability, improvement did not occur.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1080569904271083

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • On the Form of Forgetting

    Wixted, J. T., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1991) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00175.x · Cited by 513 · cited 1×

    “A decrease in score might be expected because the process of forgetting begins immediately after learning, and the loss function is steepest in the beginning (following a power curve; Wixted & Ebbesen, 1991).”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Beeler, J. D., 2001, Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 2, 48
  2. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cooper, P. L., 1984, The assessment of writing ability: A review of research
  4. 10.1177/027347539001200309 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/10528008.1993.11488419 · DOI
  6. Nunnally, J. C., 1978, Psychometric theory
  7. Reichardt, C. S., 1979, Quasi-experimentation: Design& analysis issues for field settings, 147
  8. 10.1177/108056990006300305 · DOI
  9. Strunk, W., 1979, The elements of style
  10. Wright, B. D., 1979, Best test design

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bacon, D. R., & Anderson, E. S.
Affiliations
University of Denver (US)
Venue
Business Communication Quarterly
Published
2004-12
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
443-454
ISSN
  • 1080-5699 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4191
OpenAlex
W2093373677
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Business Communication Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Management and Marketing Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Keywords
basic writing skills, marketing students, business communication, writing mechanics, editing, grammar, punctuation, word choice, student accountability, writing instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review