Redesigning a Telehealth Diabetes Management Program for a Digital Divide Seniors Population
Abstract
Recent advances in health information technologies promise to significantly improve the quality of care and quality of life for individuals who are chronically ill. However, significant challenges exist in targeting Digital Divide populations who are likely to be older, less educated, and novice computer users. This article presents a framework for understanding and reducing barriers for older adults to effectively use health information systems designed for disease management. The research is illustrated in the context of the IDEATel project, a large-scale telemedicine diabetes management and education program. The framework has three interdependent foci: hardware and software systems, tasks supported by the system, and user profiles. These foci are addressed in the context of usability and training studies. The studies document the challenges faced in facilitating patients’ access to Web resources supporting disease management. The article discusses system design changes that are intended to increase participants’ productive use of system resources.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Targeted training can mitigate barriers and improve overall outcomes.
“However, targeted training can mitigate these barriers and improve overall outcomes (38).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Kaufman, D. R., Pevzner, J., Hilliman, C., Weinstock, R. S., Teresi, J., Shea, S., & Starren, J.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
- Hebrew Home (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kaufman, David R.
- Venue
- Home Health Care Management & Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 223-234
- ISSN
- 1084-8223 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6739
- OpenAlex
- W2029777930
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Home Health Care Management & Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- telemedicine, diabetes management, digital divide, older adults, usability, health information technology, disease management, patient training, system design, chronic disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review