The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Typology of Resilience: Rethinking Institutions for Sustainable Development
Abstract
Under the general rubric of sustainability, societies are now struggling with the reconciliation of the demands of human systems and the health and continuation of the biosphere that supports them. Fundamental to coping with this challenge is the creation of decision-making and management approaches that possess an ability to operate in the face of pervasive risk and uncertainty In searching for clues to ways in which to meet the challenge, it would make sense to look to areas of human experience where change and the interaction of human and natural systems have been addressed before. We examine the intellectual areas of ecology and risk, and find that the attribute of resilience is a strong theme. A three-class typology of resilience (resistance to change; change at the margins; openness and adaptation), is developed to structure the discussion and clarify the issues. We argue that, whereas the nature of the problems facing humanity demands entertaining responses across this spectrum, current institutions and policy processes appear to be locked into "type 2"—change at the margins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6 · Cited by 5,476
Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept?
Klein, R. J. T., Nicholls, R. J., & Thomalla, F. (2003) · Environmental Hazards · doi:10.1016/j.hazards.2004.02.001 · Cited by 1,448
Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. D., Carreño, M. L., Barbat, A. H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Kienberger, S., Keiler, M., Alexander, D., Zeil, P., et al. (2013) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5 · Cited by 1,075
Pelling, M., O’Brien, K., & Matyas, D. (2015) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1303-0 · Cited by 769
Transformational adaptation: agriculture and climate change
Rickards, L., & Howden, S. M. (2012) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp11172 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Handmer, J. W., & Dovers, S. R.
- Venue
- Industrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 482-511
- ISSN
- 1087-0172 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968402012
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Typology of Resilience: Rethinking Institutions for Sustainable Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/108602669600900403
- The paper
- Handmer, J. W., & Dovers, S. R. (1996). A Typology of Resilience: Rethinking Institutions for Sustainable Development. Industrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/108602669600900403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.