Occupational Outcome in Adult ADHD: Impact of Symptom Profile, Comorbid Psychiatric Problems, and Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study of 414 Clinically Diagnosed Adult ADHD Patients
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effects of symptom profile, comorbid psychiatric problems, and treatment on occupational outcome in adult ADHD patients. Method: Adult ADHD patients ( N = 414) responded to questionnaires rating past and present symptoms of ADHD, comorbid conditions, treatment history, and work status. Results: Of the patients, 24% reported being in work, compared to 79% in a population-based control group ( N = 359). Combined subtype of ADHD, substance abuse, and a reported history of depression or anxiety were correlated with being out of work. Current and past medical treatment of ADHD was correlated with being in work. Logistic regression analyses showed that stimulant therapy during childhood was the strongest predictor for being in work as adults (odds ratio = 3.2, p = .014). Conclusion: Early recognition and treatment of ADHD is a strong predictor of being in work as an adult, independently of comorbidity, substance abuse, and current treatment. (J. of Att. Dis. 2009; 13(2) 175-187)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals with ADHD who received stimulant treatment in childhood had lower rates of depression and bipolar disorder later in life compared with individuals who were not treated.
“Halmøy et al. (2009) reported that individuals with ADHD who received stimulant treatment in childhood had lower rates of depression and bipolar disorder later in life compared with individuals who were not treated [141].”
From Adult ADHD and comorbid disorders: clinical implications of a dimensional approach (2017) · cites this paper as [141]
Children who received ADHD treatment had rates of unemployment three times lower than individuals who did not receive treatment for their ADHD as children.
“For instance, Halmøy et al. (2009) reported that children who received ADHD treatment had rates of unemployment three times lower than individuals who did not receive treatment for their ADHD as children [141].”
From Adult ADHD and comorbid disorders: clinical implications of a dimensional approach (2017) · cites this paper as [141]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 317
- Authors
- Halmøy, A., Fasmer, O. B., Gillberg, C., & Haavik, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Venue
- Journal of Attention Disorders
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-04-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-187
- ISSN
- 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1246
- OpenAlex
- W2034643246
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 10.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Keywords
- adult ADHD, occupational outcomes, employment status, psychiatric comorbidity, substance abuse, depression, anxiety, stimulant medication, early treatment, ADHD subtypes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Alcoholism, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Anxiety Disorders, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Mental Disorders, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Unemployment, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review