Methylphenidate Transdermal System in Adult ADHD and Impact on Emotional and Oppositional Symptoms
Abstract
Objective: This trial evaluated the effect of methylphenidate transdermal system (MTS) on the full spectrum of adult symptoms (attention-disorganization, hyperactivity-impulsivity, emotional dysregulation [ED], and oppositional-defiant disorder [ODD]) found in this disorder. Method: This placebo-controlled, double-blind, flexible-dose, crossover trial employed the Wender—Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS) and Connor’s Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS) and two measures of adult ODD. Treatment responses of all participants and four subgroups (ADHDalone, ADHD + ED, ADHD + ODD, and ADHD + ED + ODD) were assessed. Results: Around 23% of baseline participants were ADHD alone, 31% were ADHD + ED, 10% were ADHD + ODD, and 36% were ADHD + ED + ODD. There was a significant treatment effect for all symptom areas and all four subgroups. MTS was associated with significantly more adverse events, especially dermatologic side effects. Conclusions: MTS was effective in treating adult ADHD. This clinical trial included numerous participants meeting criteria for ED and ODD. All ADHD symptoms responded positively to treatment with MTS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a multi-center trial of 363 adults with ADHD, 24 weeks of extended-release methylphenidate produced a significant reduction in emotional lability as assessed by the emotional dysregulation items on the Wender-Reimherr Adult ADHD Scale.
“Following 24 weeks of treatment with extended release methylphenidate (MPH-ER), there was a significant reduction in emotional lability, as assessed by the emotional dysregulation items on the Wender-Reimherr Adult ADHD Scale [35].”
From Using Stimulants to Treat ADHD-Related Emotional Lability (2014) · cites this paper as [35]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- Marchant, B. K., Reimherr, F. W., Robison, R. J., Olsen, J. L., & Kondo, D. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marchant, Barrie K.
- Venue
- Journal of Attention Disorders
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-04-21
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 295-304
- ISSN
- 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1246
- OpenAlex
- W2080494105
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- adult ADHD, emotional dysregulation, oppositional defiant disorder, hyperactivity/impulsivity, transdermal drug delivery, dermatologic adverse events
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Cutaneous, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review