Cited by 42Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Working Memory and Response Inhibition as One Integral Phenotype of Adult ADHD? A Behavioral and Imaging Correlational Investigation

Open access
Schecklmann, Martin, Ehlis, Ann-Christine, Plichta, Michael M., Dresler, Thomas, Heine, Monika, Boreatti-Hümmer, Andrea, Romanos, Marcel, Jacob, Christian +2 more·2013·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: It is an open question whether working memory (WM) and response inhibition (RI) constitute one integral phenotype in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method: The authors investigated 45 adult ADHD patients and 41 controls comparable for age, gender, intelligence, and education during a letter n-back and a stop-signal task, and measured prefrontal oxygenation by means of functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: The authors replicated behavioral and cortical activation deficits in patients compared with controls for both tasks and also for performance in both control conditions. In the patient group, 2-back performance was correlated with stop-signal reaction time. This correlation did not seem to be specific for WM and RI as 1-back performance was correlated with go reaction time. No significant correlations of prefrontal oxygenation between WM and RI were found. Conclusion: The authors’ findings do not support the hypothesis of WM and RI representing one integral phenotype of ADHD mediated by the prefrontal cortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054711429702

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 42

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Boonstra, A. M., Oosterlaan, J., Sergeant, J. A., & Buitelaar, J. K. (2005). Executive functioning in adult ADHD: A metaanalytic review. Psychological Medicine, 35 , 1097-1108.
  3. Durston, S. (2003). A review of the biological bases of ADHD: What have we learned from imaging studies? Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9 , 184-195.
  4. Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1977). The place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality description. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16 , 57-68.
  5. Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003). The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160 , 636-645.
  6. Hervey, A. S., Epstein, J. N., & Curry, J. F. (2004). Neuropsychology of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology, 18 , 485-503.
  7. Hoshi, Y. (2007). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 12 (6), 062106.
  8. Lijffijt, M., Bekker, E. M., Quik, E. H., Bakker, J., Kenemans, J. L., & Verbaten, M. N. (2004). Differences between low and high trait impulsivity are not associated with differences in inhibitory motor control. Journal of Attention Disorders, 8 , 25-32.
  9. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189-239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  10. Logothetis, N. K., & Wandell, B. A. (2004). Interpreting the BOLD signal. Annual Review in Physiology, 66 , 735-769.
  11. Mahone, E. M., Pillion, J. P., Hoffman, J., Hiemenz, J. R., & Denckla, M. B. (2005). Construct validity of the auditory continuous performance test for preschoolers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27 (1), 11-33.
  12. Mullane, J. C., & Corkum, P. V. (2007). The relationship between working memory, inhibition, and performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in children with and without ADHD. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25 , 211-221.
  13. Obrig, H., & Villringer, A. (2003). Beyond the visible-Imaging the human brain with light. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 23 , 1-18.
  14. Rommelse, N. N., Van der Stigchel, S., Witlox, J., Geldof, C., Deijen, J. B., Theeuwes, J., . . . Sergeant, J. A. (2008). Deficits in visuo-spatial working memory, inhibition and oculomotor control in boys with ADHD and their non-affected brothers. Journal of Neural Transmission, 115 , 249-260.
  15. Schecklmann, M., Romanos, M., Bretscher, F., Plichta, M. M., Warnke, A., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2010). Prefrontal oxygenation during working memory in ADHD. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44 , 621-628.
  16. Solanto, M. V., Abikoff, H., Sonuga Barke, E., Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., Wigal, T., . . . Turkel, E. (2001). The ecological validity of delay aversion and response inhibition as measures of impulsivity in AD/HD: A supplement to the NIMH multimodal treatment study of AD/HD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29 , 215-228.
  17. Soreni, N., Crosbie, J., Ickowicz, A., & Schachar, R. (2009). Stop signal and Conners' continuous performance tasks: Testretest reliability of two inhibition measures in ADHD children. Journal of Attention Disorders, 13 , 137-143.
  18. Winstanley, C. A., Eagle, D. M., & Robbins, T. W. (2006). Behavioral models of impulsivity in relation to ADHD: Translation between clinical and preclinical studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 26 , 379-395.
  19. Wodka, E. L., Mahone, E. M., Blankner, J. G., Larson, J. C., Fotedar, S., Denckla, M. B., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2007). Evidence that response inhibition is a primary deficit in ADHD. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29 , 345-356.
  20. Woods, S. P., Lovejoy, D. W., & Ball, J. D. (2002). Neuropsychological characteristics of adults with ADHD: A comprehensive review of initial studies. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16 , 12-34.

Authors
Schecklmann, M., Ehlis, A.-C., Plichta, M. M., Dresler, T., Heine, M., Boreatti-Hümmer, A., Romanos, M., Jacob, C., Pauli, P., & Fallgatter, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Würzburg, Germany
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2012-02-08
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
470-482
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2037295230
Cited by
42
References
74
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KFO 125-1, KFO125)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
adult ADHD, working memory, response inhibition, prefrontal cortex, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, stop-signal task, reaction time, cognitive phenotypes
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Phenotype, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Prefrontal Cortex, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review