Cited by 66Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The Childhood Executive Function Inventory: Confirmatory Factor Analyses and Cross-Cultural Clinical Validity in a Sample of 8- to 11-Year-Old Children

Catale, Corinne, Meulemans, Thierry, Thorell, Lisa B.·2015·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to investigate the psychometric characteristics of the French adaptation of the Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory (CHEXI) in children and to explore the cross-cultural validity of the CHEXI in discriminating between children with ADHD and controls in two culturally different samples (Belgian and Swedish). Method: Study I included normally developing children ( n = 242), whereas Study II included both children diagnosed with ADHD ( n = 87) and controls ( n = 87). CHEXI ratings were collected from parents. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses replicated the two-factor solution, referred to as inhibition and working memory, which had been identified previously. Both subscales had good psychometric properties. Furthermore, the CHEXI was found to discriminate, with high sensitivity and specificity, between children with ADHD and controls in both cultural samples. Conclusion: The CHEXI can be considered as a valuable screening measure for ADHD in children, but the cross-cultural clinical implications of ratings have to be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054712470971

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Catale, C., Meulemans, T., & Thorell, L. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2013-01-25
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
489-495
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2096801882
Cited by
66
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
executive function, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, French adaptation, cross-cultural validity, inhibition, working memory, parent ratings, screening measures, psychometric properties, children
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Belgium, Child, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Language, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Parents, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review