Production of the α and β Subunits of Spirulina Allophycocyanin and C-Phycocyanin in Escherichia coli: A Comparative Study of Their Antioxidant Activities
Open accessAbstract
Allophycocyanin and c-phycocyanin have been reported to be potent antioxidants. In this work, the genes encoding the apo-proteins of allophycocyanin α (ApcA), allophycocyanin β (ApcB), c-phycocyanin α (CpcA), and c-phycocyanin β (CpcB) from Spirulina platensis were cloned, and the recombinant proteins were produced in Escherichia coli to study their antioxidant effects. All four recombinant phycocyanins could be produced in the soluble form and purified to more than 97% purity. The results of radical scavenging assays showed that the Trolox equivalent values for peroxyl radical scavenging by the ApcA, ApcB, CpcA, and CpcB proteins were 1.81 ± 0.2 µM, 1.98 ± 0.22 µM, 0.95 ± 0.15 µM, and 1.49 ± 0.15 µM, respectively. The IC50 values for hydroxyl radical scavenging of ApcA, ApcB, CpcA, CpcB, and Trolox were 269 ± 9 µg/mL, 190 ± 5 µg/mL, 129 ± 8 µg/mL, 108 ± 4 µg/mL, and 195 ± 12 µg/mL, respectively. These results indicated that allophycocyanin exhibited higher activity than c-phycocyanin in scavenging peroxyl radicals, whereas c-phycocyanin exhibited higher activity than allophycocyanin in scavenging hydroxyl radicals. All of the apo-phycocyanin subunits possessed strong antioxidant activities and can be further developed and applied to the food and drug industries. However, the selection of the most useful antioxidant should depend on the type of targeted free radical to obtain the highest efficiency.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Allophycocyanin has strong antioxidant activity, proving higher than phycocyanin at scavenging peroxyl radicals, whereas phycocyanin is better at scavenging hydroxyl radicals.
“In addition to phycocyanin, allophycocyanin has strong antioxidant activity, proving to be higher than phycocyanin as scavenging peroxyl radicals whereas phycocyanin is better at scavenging hydroxyl radicals [32].”
From Beneficial Effects of Spirulina Consumption on Brain Health (2022) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Cherdkiatikul, T., & Suwanwong, Y.
- Affiliations
- Chulalongkorn University (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Suwanwong, Yaneenart
- ORCID
- Suwanwong, Yaneenart
- Venue
- SLAS DISCOVERY
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 959-965
- ISSN
- 2472-5552 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084736888
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- SLAS DISCOVERY (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Metabolism and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Keywords
- allophycocyanin, C-phycocyanin, antioxidant activity, free radical scavenging, peroxy radicals, hydroxyl radicals, recombinant protein expression, Spirulina platensis, apo protein, gene cloning, radical scavengers
- MeSH terms
- Antioxidants, Chromans, Escherichia coli, Free Radicals, Genetic Vectors, Oxygen, Phycocyanin, Plasmids, Recombinant Proteins, Reproducibility of Results, Hydroxyl Radical, DNA Primers, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Spirulina
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review