The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Bliss Independence Model to Analyze Drug Combination Data
Open accessAbstract
The Bliss independence model is widely used to analyze drug combination data when screening for candidate drug combinations. The method compares the observed combination response (Y(O)) with the predicted combination response (Y(P)), which was obtained based on the assumption that there is no effect from drug-drug interactions. Typically, the combination effect is declared synergistic if Y(O) is greater than Y(P). However, this method lacks statistical rigor because it does not take into account the variability of the response measures and can frequently cause false-positive claims. In this article, we introduce a two-stage response surface model to describe the drug interaction across all dose combinations tested. This new method enables robust statistical testing for synergism at any dose combination, thus reducing the risk of false positives. The use of the method is illustrated through an application describing statistically significant "synergy regions" for candidate drug combinations targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even when replicates are available, multiple testing problems arise from repeatedly performing a statistical test across all combination doses (Zhao et al 2014).”
From Evaluation of Drug Combination Effect Using a Bliss Independence Dose–Response Surface Model (2018) · cites this paper as Zhao et al 2014
Citations
Cites
The search for synergy: a critical review from a response surface perspective.
Greco, W. R., Bravo, G., & Parsons, J. C. (1995) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(25)06847-4 · Cited by 1,445
Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics
(1996) · doi:10.1142/2898 · Cited by 1,406
Sun, T., Aceto, N., Meerbrey, K. L., Kessler, J. D., Zhou, C., Migliaccio, I., Nguyen, D. X., Pavlova, N. N., Botero, M. F., Huang, J., et al. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.003 · Cited by 281 · cited 4×
“I Y Y M a b ab O ab P = − = + , , ( | , ) Γ ε, (3)”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA global analysis of cross-talk in a mammalian cellular signalling network
Natarajan, M., Lin, K.-M., Hsueh, R. C., Sternweis, P. C., & Ranganathan, R. (2006) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1418 · Cited by 235 · cited 1×
“Average percentage inhibition is usually used when replicates are available and a conclusion can be drawn by strictly following equations (1) and (2).”
MethodProbability Theory and Mathematical Statistics.
Bartholomew, D. J., & Fisz, M. (1964) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2334227 · Cited by 161
Dong, J., Sereno, A., Aivazian, D., Langley, E. J., Miller, B., Snyder, W. B., Chan, E., Cantele, M., Morena, R., Joseph, I. B. J., et al. (2011) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.3.3.15188 · Cited by 80
Jameson, M. J., Beckler, A. D., Taniguchi, L. E., Allak, A., VanWagner, L. B., Lee, N. G., Thomsen, W. C., Hubbard, M. A., & Thomas, C. Y. (2011) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-11-0294 · Cited by 79
The EGF receptor interacts with the type 1 IGF receptor and regulates its stability
Riedemann, J., Takiguchi, M., Sohail, M., & Macaulay, V. M. (2007) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.02.012 · Cited by 77
Galer, C. E., Corey, C. L., Wang, Z., Younes, M. N., Gomez‐Rivera, F., Jasser, S. A., Ludwig, D. L., El‐Naggar, A. K., Weber, R. S., & Myers, J. N. (2010) · Head & Neck · doi:10.1002/hed.21419 · Cited by 53
Rational Design of Cancer-Drug Combinations
Ramaswamy, S. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcibr072593 · Cited by 48 · cited 1×
“Average percentage inhibition is usually used when replicates are available and a conclusion can be drawn by strictly following equations (1) and (2).”
Method
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–328 of 328
Predicting Synergistic Anticancer Drug Combinations via Graph Attention Network
Kim, S.-M., & Yoo, S. (2026) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2026.27.3.831
Efficacy and synergy of low-dose radiotherapy combined with anti-PD-L1 based immunotherapy
Laurent, P.-A. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e7695737z26a3z4747zafafzb19e3e74372b
WNT-driven chromosomal instability as a biomarker for PORCN inhibitionPreprint
Garcia-Lopez, D., Zoufir, A., Hernando, B., Santamarı́a, P. G., Cádiz, A., Terraube, H. D. G., Madrid, L., Cullen, A. E., Woodcock, S. A., Piskorz, A., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.04.13.718275
“…in monotherapy trials 17,52 ( Figure 4a ) and combination trials 45,53 ( Supplementary Figure 7 , PORCN inhibitors plus anti-PD1 immunotherapy) where we applied the Bliss Independence model 54 to mathematically infer the PORCN inhibitor-driven component of the clinical response (see Methods ).”
Hamese, S., Takundwa, M. M., Prinsloo, E., & Raj, D. B. T. G. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.04.21.719801
G-García, M. E., la Rosa-Herencia, A. S. D., Gil-Duque, I., Arroyo-Millan, L., Venegas, E., Herrera-Martínez, A. D., Bellido, M., Núñez-Santos, M. Á., Montero‐Hidalgo, A. J., Gavilán, I., et al. (2026) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2026.119482
Raman, T. Ş., Kühnert, M., Konieczny, R., Lippmann, N., Kaiser, A., Werdehausen, R., Abel, B., & Schulze, A. (2026) · Biomaterials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.bioadv.2026.214946 · Cited by 1
Calopiz, M. C., Linderman, J. J., & Thurber, G. M. (2026) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013872
“These cell-killing mechanisms are additive at the mechanistic level, but they would include overlapping killing, such as T cells killing a perivascular cell that already internalized a lethal dose of payload, similar to the Bliss model of independence [15].”
Zheng, J., Chen, X., Jiang, J., & Wu, F. (2026) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics14060506
“Additionally, the Bliss independence model was employed to determine the types of interaction present in the mixture groups [46].”
Cellular and molecular responses of Cryptococcus to brilacidin
Bezerra, B. T., Mellon, D. A., Souza, C. M., Castelli, R. F., Camillo-Andrade, A. C., Santos, M. H. S., Carvalho, P. C., Rodrigues, M. L., & de Oliveira, H. C. (2026) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00138-26
“Consider ing the differences in chemical nature and cellular targets of AmB and the test com pounds, the Bliss independence model (39) was used to calculate synergy scores via the SynergyFinder tool (40).”
Wagaw, K., Lupo, Y., Sikron-Persi, N., Acuña, T., Lazarovitch, N., & Fait, A. (2026) · Plant Stress · doi:10.1016/j.stress.2026.101456 · Cited by 1
Khanh, L. N., Anh, N. T. L., Quynh, N. T. N., Tùng, N. T., Hồ, Đ. V., Hoai, N. T., Huong, P. T., & Nguyen, T. K. (2026) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2026.108666
Jeong, Y., & Byun, J. H. (2026) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2026.1834793
Gupta, J., Shelar, S. B., Dutta, B., Ahirwar, S., Lawande, M. A., & Barick, K. C. (2026) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2026.117538
FAROUK, R., Lee, D. J., Aboelmagd, S., Kwon, H., Jeong, S.-H., Han, S. I., Cheong, D., Ny, S., Seo, H.-R., Lee, C., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2026.1786048
“Data were imported into SynergyFinder 3.0 in the replicate-example format to ensure appropriate curve-fitting and synergy analysis (Zhao et al., 2014; Wagoner et al., 2022).”
InfluentialPanzeri, V., Pieraccioli, M., Ruta, V., Manno, M. V., Caggiano, C., Hartem, D., Riente, A., Milletti, G., Quero, G., Alfieri, S., et al. (2026) · Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13046-026-03795-3
“Values were expressed as the difference between the expected and the observed effect, the cutoff of 0.10 was used as threshold for synergy between drugs, while values between 0 and 0.1 indicated additivity between the drugs [38].”
InfluentialSong, B., Zhang, H., Long, Y., Zhu, X., Huang, M., Liao, G., Chen, M., Qin, L., Chen, X., & Zhu, F. (2026) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.71212
Boonsatit, N., Fungfueang, S., Thongyim, S., Tragoolpua, Y., Disayathanoowat, T., Baillie, G. S., & Panya, A. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27177782
“The interaction between melittin and C. nutans extract was evaluated using the Bliss independence model [64].”
Deng, O., Nepomuceno, T. C., Fang, B., Welsh, E. A., Izumi, V., Martin, R. H., George, E. M., Koomen, J. M., Monteiro, A. N., & Rix, U. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0357365
Civelek, İ. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27188241
“This approach avoids the requirement of multi-parameter analysis of concentration–response curves in serial dilution experiments [46,47].”
Babalola, A. A., da Silva, A. F., da Silva, S. W., Soares, M. V., Aschner, M., & Soares, F. A. A. (2026) · NeuroToxicology · doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2026.103576
Hamese, S., Takundwa, M. M., Prinsloo, E., & Raj, D. B. T. G. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10926147/v1
Immunomodulatory Potential of KSTM in Activating Natural Killer Cells for Cancer Cell Elimination
Pianmak, T., Panya, A., Boonsatit, N., Tabtimmai, L., & Choowongkomon, K. (2026) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph19101525
“The interactions between NK cells and each herbal extract (KERRA, KS, and Minoza) were evaluated separately using the Bliss independence model [44].”
Smirnova, A., Kontareva, E., Nofal, Z., Kryuchikhin, V., Chigasova, A., Drozhzhin, N. A., Andreev, E. V., Fadeikina, I. N., Mutali, A., Nechaev, A., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27198632
“We used the Bliss independence method to see if irradiation and adding NPs to the cells worked together in any way [18].”
Liu, X., Zhou, H., Chen, S., Zeng, H., Liu, H., Shi, W., Li, B., & Xin, H. (2026) · Laser & Photonics Review · doi:10.1002/lpor.72014
Wang, Q., Song, Q., Wang, D., Lee, S.-P., & Wu, W.-Y. (2026) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2026.112200
Rollin‐Pinheiro, R., de Castro-Almeida, Y., Xisto, M. I. D. D. S., de Souza-Santos, J., de Moraes, D. C., Vicente, B., Midlej, V. D. V. P., Toledo, F. T., Ferrarini, R., Ferreira, G. M., et al. (2026) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules31203691
“Bliss independence model was performed according to Meletiadis and colleagues and Zhao and colleagues [46,64].”
Kamel, M. M., Zaki, H. F., Saleh, R. A., Henry, S. R., Ibrahim, M. K., Bakr, M. M., Abouhussein, D. M. N., & Rabie, M. A. (2026) · Pharmacia · doi:10.3897/pharmacia.73.e205623
“Using the Bliss Independence Model, Y P = 0.23 + 0.18 – (0.23 * 0.18) = 0.3686, Y O = 0.42, since Y O > Y P , the combined treat-ment had synergistic effects.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, W., Sachsenmeier, K., Zhang, L., Sult, E., Hollingsworth, R. E., & Yang, H.
- Affiliations
- AbbVie (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Wei
- Venue
- SLAS Discovery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 817-821
- ISSN
- 2472-5552 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980181290
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 15.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- SLAS DISCOVERY (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Keywords
- Bliss independence model, drug synergy, drug-drug interactions, false positive reduction, epidermal growth factor receptor, IGF-1 receptor, drug combination screening
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Combinations, Drug Interactions, Drug Synergism, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Models, Chemical, Neoplasms, Regression Analysis, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Signal Transduction, Receptor, IGF Type 1, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review