The Many Ways to Be Marginal in a Group
Abstract
Previous theory and research primarily address marginal group members on the path to achieve core membership status. The authors argue that these only represent one form of marginality and that there are many other ways to be marginal within the group. The authors develop a dynamic model in which marginality is conceptualized as resulting from group and individual negotiation about inclusion (the Marginality as Resulting From Group and Individual Negotiation About Inclusion [MARGINI] model), and where individual and group inclusion goals can converge (resulting in relatively stable forms of marginality) or diverge (resulting in less stable forms of marginality). When the marginal position is unstable, individuals can either be motivated to move toward or move further away from the group, and such changing inclusion goals are associated with different emotions and behaviors. The authors argue that one needs to understand the interplay between individual and group inclusion goals to predict and explain the full complexity and diversity of the behavior of marginal group members.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 212 · Cited by 139
- Authors
- Ellemers, N., & Jetten, J.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-08-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-21
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2001369088
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 212
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 22.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- marginality, group membership, group dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Group Structure, Humans, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Psychological Distance, Social Identification, Socialization, Social Marginalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review