Reconceptualizing Self-Affirmation With the Trigger and Channel Framework: Lessons From the Health Domain
Abstract
Self-affirmation-a theory-based technique to affirm the adaptive adequacy of the self-can promote positive behavior change and adaptive outcomes, although effects are variable. We extend a novel framework (Trigger and Channel), proposing three conditions that facilitate self-affirmation-induced behavior change: (a) presence of psychological threat, (b) presence of resources to foster change, and (c) timeliness of the self-affirmation with respect to threat and resources. Using health behavior as a focus, we present meta-analytic evidence demonstrating that when these conditions are met, self-affirmation acts as a psychological trigger into a positive channel of resources that facilitate behavior change. The presence of a timely threat and the availability of timely resources independently predicted larger self-affirmation effects on behavior change, and the two interacted synergistically to predict still larger effects. The results illustrate the conditionality of self-affirmation effects and offer guidelines for when, where, and for whom self-affirmation will be most effective.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For a new perspective from a wise intervention to bring about lasting and meaningful change, the context needs to react to, support, and sustain such a change.
“but in order for this new perspective to bring about lasting and meaningful change, the context needs to react to, support, and sustain such a change: the seed that the intervention plants needs fertile soil in which to grow”
From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Ferrer & Cohen, 2018
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 111 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Ferrer, R. A., & Cohen, G. L.
- Affiliations
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ferrer, Rebecca A.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-10-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-304
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2896971339
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Keywords
- self-affirmation, psychological threat, psychological resources, health behavior change
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Self Concept, Health Behavior, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review