Using Animated Videos to Increase Patient Knowledge: A Meta-Analytic Review.
Abstract
This article meta-analyzed 21 studies that tested the effectiveness of animated videos in improving learning in clinical and nonclinical settings compared with standard education. Animation was defined as the use of moving objects that are typically drawn or simulated. Videos ranged from just over 2 min in duration to 16 min in duration in articles published from 2009 through 2020. Mayer’s Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning provided the theoretical model to frame the current analyses. Findings indicated an overall positive effect ( d = 0.35) for use of animation in improving viewers’ learning across a variety of health and clinical contexts, including surgery and diabetes. Moderator analyses indicated learning effects were greater in patient samples and samples with a higher proportion of male participants. Study findings were discussed in terms of the theoretical and practical implications for health communication scholars and practitioners.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research has suggested that the use of animations can improve participants knowledge about trials and their attitudes towards taking part.
“Research has suggested that the use of animations can improve participants knowledge about trials and their attitudes towards taking part [28].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Feeley, T. H., Keller, M., & Kayler, L.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Erie County Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feeley, Thomas Hugh
- Venue
- Health Education & Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-08-11
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 240-249
- ISSN
- 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6127
- OpenAlex
- W4291019585
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Education & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Resources and Services Administration (R39OT31887)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- animated video, patient knowledge, health education, multimedia learning, Mayer's Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, patient education, surgical training, diabetes education, learning effectiveness, health communication
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Learning, Male, Videotape Recording, Multimedia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review