Cited by 85Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesMedia Influence and HealthHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Using Animated Videos to Increase Patient Knowledge: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Feeley, Thomas Hugh, Keller, Maria, Kayler, Liise·2023·Health Education & Behavior

Abstract

This article meta-analyzed 21 studies that tested the effectiveness of animated videos in improving learning in clinical and nonclinical settings compared with standard education. Animation was defined as the use of moving objects that are typically drawn or simulated. Videos ranged from just over 2 min in duration to 16 min in duration in articles published from 2009 through 2020. Mayer’s Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning provided the theoretical model to frame the current analyses. Findings indicated an overall positive effect ( d = 0.35) for use of animation in improving viewers’ learning across a variety of health and clinical contexts, including surgery and diabetes. Moderator analyses indicated learning effects were greater in patient samples and samples with a higher proportion of male participants. Study findings were discussed in terms of the theoretical and practical implications for health communication scholars and practitioners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10901981221116791

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 85

Authors
Feeley, T. H., Keller, M., & Kayler, L.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Erie County Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Feeley, Thomas Hugh
Venue
Health Education & Behavior
Published
2022-08-11
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
240-249
ISSN
  • 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6127
OpenAlex
W4291019585
Cited by
85
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Resources and Services Administration (R39OT31887)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
animated video, patient knowledge, health education, multimedia learning, Mayer's Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, patient education, surgical training, diabetes education, learning effectiveness, health communication
MeSH terms
Humans, Learning, Male, Videotape Recording, Multimedia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review