The Health Belief Model and Preventive Health Behavior
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social cognitive theorists propose intention to be the strongest predictor of behavior.
“Based on previous conscious rational models, social cognitive theorists propose intention to be the strongest predictor of behavior, thus suggesting intention as the primary conscious motive for behavior (Ajzen, 1991; Rogers, 1974; Rosenstock, 1974).”
From Exercise habit formation in new gym members: a longitudinal study (2015) · cites this paper as Rosenstock, 1974
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 3,643
- Authors
- Rosenstock, I. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rosenstock, Irwin M.
- Venue
- Health Education Monographs
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1974-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 354-386
- ISSN
- 0073-1455 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1794403333
- Cited by
- 3,643
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 349 · 2025: 333 · 2024: 292 · 2023: 230 · 2022: 272 · 2021: 270 · 2020: 174 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 105 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 56
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Education Monographs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- Health Belief Model, preventive health behavior, health behavior change, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review