The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors That Contribute to Effective Community Health Promotion Coalitions: A Study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalitions in North Carolina
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify factors that contribute to the effectiveness of community health promotion coalitions. Member survey data from 10 coalitions formed as part of North Carolina Project ASSIST were analyzed at the coalition level to identify factors related to member participation, member satisfaction, quality of the action plan, resource mobilization, and implementation. The results suggest that coalitions with good communication and skilled members had higher levels of member participation. Coalitions with skilled staff, skilled leadership, good communication, and more of a task focus had higher levels of member satisfaction. Coalitions with more staff time devoted to them and more complex structures had greater resource mobilization, and coalitions with more staff time, good communication, greater cohesion, and more complex structures had higher levels of implementation. Neither member participation nor member satisfaction correlated with the other measures of coalition effectiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Farquhar, J. W. (1990) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450030083037 · Cited by 448
Cited by
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0 · Cited by 5,304
Lasker, R. D., Weiss, E. S., & Miller, R. (2001) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00203 · Cited by 1,053
Reconsidering Community-Based Health Promotion: Promise, Performance, and Potential
Merzel, C., & D’Afflitti, J. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.4.557 · Cited by 713
NETWORKING LITERATURE ABOUT DETERMINANTS OF NETWORK EFFECTIVENESS
TURRINI, A., CRISTOFOLI, D., FROSINI, F., & NASI, G. (2009) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01791.x · Cited by 447
What Explains Community Coalition Effectiveness?
Zakocs, R. C., & Edwards, E. M. (2006) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.004 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Kegler, M. C., Steckler, A., Mcleroy, K., & Malek, S. H.
- Venue
- Health Education & Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 338-353
- ISSN
- 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6127
- OpenAlex
- W2143961265
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors That Contribute to Effective Community Health Promotion Coalitions: A Study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalitions in North Carolina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/109019819802500308
- The paper
- Kegler, M. C., Steckler, A., Mcleroy, K., & Malek, S. H. (1998). Factors That Contribute to Effective Community Health Promotion Coalitions: A Study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalitions in North Carolina. Health Education & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819802500308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
