Epigenetic Regulation in Environmental Chemical Carcinogenesis and its Applicability in Human Health Risk Assessment
Abstract
Although several studies have shown that chemically mediated epigenetic changes are an etiological factor in several human disease conditions, the utility of epigenetic data, such as DNA methylation, in the current human health risk assessment paradigm is unclear. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between the points of departure (PODs) for cancer incidence and DNA methylation changes in laboratory animals exposed to the following environmental toxicants: bromodichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, chloroform, hydrazine, trichloroethylene, benzidine, trichloroacetic acid, and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP; a known reproductive toxicant). The results demonstrate that the PODs for cancer incidence and altered DNA methylation are similar. Furthermore, based on the available data, the POD for DNA methylation appeared more sensitive compared to that for cancer incidence following the administration of DEHP to rats during different life stages. The high degree of correlation between PODs for cancer incidence and DNA methylation (for both total DNA and individual genes) suggests that DNA methylation end points could potentially be used as a screening tool in predicting the potential toxicity/carcinogenicity and in prioritizing large numbers of chemicals with sparse toxicity databases. The life stage during which treatment occurs is also an important consideration when assessing the potential application of epigenetic end points as a screening tool.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lipid oxidation, toxicology, and epigenetics are understudied areas.
“For this aspect, lipid oxidation, toxicology, and epigenetics are understudied areas [121,122];”
From Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications (2024) · cites this paper as [121]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Kuppusamy, S. P., Kaiser, J. P., & Wesselkamper, S. C.
- Affiliations
- Environmental Protection Agency (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wesselkamper, Scott C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Toxicology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-08-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 384-392
- ISSN
- 1091-5818 (ISSN-L)
- 1092-874X
- OpenAlex
- W1960677851
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Toxicology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
- Keywords
- epigenetic regulation, DNA methylation, human health risk assessment, point of departure, cancer incidence, DEHP, trichloroethylene, chloroform, hydrazine, bromodichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, benzidine, trichloroacetic acid, carcinogenicity testing, chemical prioritization
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Benzidines, Carcinogens, Diethylhexyl Phthalate, Humans, Hydrazines, Hydrocarbons, Halogenated, Neoplasms, Risk Assessment, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review