Cited by 2,706Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsBusiness Strategies and Management Research

Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects.

Siemsen, Enno, Roth, Aleda, Oliveira, Pedro·2010·Organizational Research Methods

Abstract

This research analyzes the effects of common method variance (CMV) on parameter estimates in bivariate linear, multivariate linear, quadratic, and interaction regression models. The authors demonstrate that CMV can either inflate or deflate bivariate linear relationships, depending on the degree of symmetry with which CMV affects the observed measures. With respect to multivariate linear relationships, they show that common method bias generally decreases when additional independent variables suffering from CMV are included in a regression equation. Finally, they demonstrate that quadratic and interaction effects cannot be artifacts of CMV. On the contrary, both quadratic and interaction terms can be severely deflated through CMV, making them more difficult to detect through statistical means.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1094428109351241

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of multi-source measurement reduces concerns regarding common source variance with respect to inflating main effects and attenuating interaction effects.

    “Another methodological strength was the use of multi-source measurement which reduces concerns regarding common source variance with respect to inflating the main effects found between predictors and the dependent variables as well as regarding the attenuation of the interaction effects (Siemsen et al., 2010).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 2,706

Authors
Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT)
Corresponding author
Siemsen, Enno
Venue
Organizational Research Methods
Published
2009-11-30
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
456-476
ISSN
  • 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7425
OpenAlex
W2130091537
Cited by
2,706
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 197 · 2025: 179 · 2024: 210 · 2023: 185 · 2022: 269 · 2021: 232 · 2020: 236 · 2019: 211 · 2018: 186 · 2017: 168 · 2016: 169 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 74
FWCI
55.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organizational Research Methods (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
common method variance, methodological bias, quadratic effects, interaction effects, multivariate linear regression, parameter estimation bias, measurement artifacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review