Cited by 210Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyTechnology Use by Older Adults

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Technology Readiness-Based Taxonomy of Customers: A Replication and Extension

Tsikriktsis, Nikos·2004·Journal of Service Research

Abstract

Although the service management field has developed and put forward new concepts, we have historically done a less effective job validating these concepts after their introduction. Given this issue, this study attempts to test and extend Parasuraman and Colby’s (2001) taxonomy of technology readiness. Their taxonomy (originally developed based on a U.S. sample) was replicated with a U.K. sample. This study’s replication partially supports their taxonomy of five types of customers based on their technology beliefs. The author found support for the existence of four of the five original clusters (explorers, pioneers, skeptics , andlaggards ) but found no evidence of the existence of a fifth segment named paranoids . The author also identifies the themes that underlie the formation of the taxonomy, namely, technophobia and technological positivism. Finally, for each cluster, the relationships between technology readiness, demographics, current use, and future adoption of technology-based services are explored and compared.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1094670504266132

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x · DOI
  2. Ajzen, I., 1980, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior
  3. 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.4135/9781412983648 · DOI
  5. Arabie, P., 1994, Advanced Methods in Marketing Research, 160
  6. 10.5465/amr.1989.4308374 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.4135/9781452231327.n8 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/CBO9780511528224 · DOI
  9. Bower, G. H., 1981, Theories of Learning
  10. 10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00022-9 · DOI
  11. Chang, Ai-Mei, 2002, “Preparing for Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Government,”
  12. Colby, C. L., 2002, e-Service: New Directions in Theory and Practice, 25
  13. 10.1177/1094670502238916 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/014920639301900403 · DOI
  15. Dewald, W. G., 1986, American Economic Review, 76, 587
  16. 10.2307/256860 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-X · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00063-8 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/smj.4250040206 · DOI
  20. Hair, J. F., Jr., 1995, Multivariate Data Analysis
  21. 10.1080/07421222.1992.11517949 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hempel, G. C., 1966, Philosophy of Natural Science
  23. Hofstede, Geert, 1980, Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values
  24. 10.1145/6138.6143 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0167-8116(94)90003-5 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0148-2963(95)00084-4 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<243::AID-SMJ951>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1177/014920638901500302 · DOI
  29. Kane, E. J., 1984, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 23, 3
  30. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199606)17:6<441::AID-SMJ819>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  31. 10.2307/256812 · DOI
  32. Kuhn, T., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
  33. 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00435.x · DOI
  34. Lindsay, R. M., 1993, American Statistician, 47, 217, 10.1080/00031305.1993.10475983 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/00913367.1995.10673490 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00271.x · DOI
  37. 10.2307/256809 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.2307/249311 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0747-5632(86)90010-5 · DOI
  40. Nunnally, J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory
  41. Parasuraman, A., 2001, Techno-Ready Marketing: How and Why Your Customers Adopt Technology
  42. Popper, K., 1978, Conjectures and Refutations
  43. 10.2307/3151680 · DOI
  44. Raub, A. C. (1981), “Correlates of Computer Anxiety in College Students,” doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. · DOI
  45. Rogers, E. M., 1995, Diffusion of Innovations
  46. Rosenthal, R., 1984, Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis
  47. 10.1177/109467050134001 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/109467002237490 · DOI
  49. 10.2307/3151510 · DOI
  50. 10.1287/mnsc.25.10.966 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tsikriktsis, N.
Affiliations
London Business School (GB)
Corresponding author
Tsikriktsis, Nikos
Venue
Journal of Service Research
Published
2004-08
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
42-52
ISSN
  • 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7379
OpenAlex
W2160577941
Cited by
210
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Service Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
technology readiness, customer segmentation, technology beliefs, explorers, pioneers, skeptics, laggards, technophobia, technology adoption, technology-based services, service management, replication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review