The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Emergent Field of Organizational Frontlines
Abstract
Advances in frontline interface technologies and devices are profoundly disrupting how organizations and customers interact to create and exchange value. Where once customer interactions were limited in variety, multiplicity, and complexity, today’s broadband Internet and wireless connection technologies defy limitations to enable organization-customer interactions of ever-increasing diversity and consistency across multiple points of customer contact. No longer are the frontlines inert backgrounds for organizational action involving customers; rather, they are evolving as sites of vibrant innovations and interventions that engage customers, enhance customer experiences, and motivate value (co)creation. To anchor this emergent field, we define organizational frontlines at the intersection of interfaces and interactions that connect organizations and their customers. We historically trace the use of “organizational frontlines” from its initial application in military and management domains through its current and proposed position in both academic and practitioner contexts. We illustrate our definition to highlight research opportunities and underscore the strategic implications for effectively managing organizational frontlines to secure competitive advantage. We conclude with a discussion of special issue articles and the exciting agenda they collectively engage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Frambach, R. T., Fiss, P. C., & Ingenbleek, P. T. M. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.120 · Cited by 230
Cited by
Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A., & Trichina, E. (2022) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1871398 · Cited by 1,134
“Within this context, several authors support the view that AI can be of great value in facilitating service or sales and creating more favorable, customized and valued service interactions (Marinova et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2017).”
BackgroundCustomer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms
Bolton, R. N., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Cheung, L., Gallan, A., Orsingher, C., Witell, L., & Zaki, M. (2018) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-04-2018-0113 · Cited by 849
Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2019) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-08-2018-0368 · Cited by 851
Hilken, T., de Ruyter, K., Chylinski, M., Mahr, D., & Keeling, D. I. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0541-x · Cited by 693
Adoption of artificial intelligence in banking services: an empirical analysis
Rahman, M., Ming, T. H., Baigh, T. A., & Sarker, M. (2023) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-06-2020-0724 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, J., Brady, M., Arnold, T., & Brown, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Service Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-12-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-11
- ISSN
- 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7379
- OpenAlex
- W2560380401
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Emergent Field of Organizational Frontlines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1094670516681513
- The paper
- Singh, J., Brady, M., Arnold, T., & Brown, T. (2017). The Emergent Field of Organizational Frontlines. Journal of Service Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670516681513
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.