Cited by 116Digital Economy and Work TransformationLegal and Labor StudiesEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Microworkers of the Gig Economy: Separate and Precarious

Webster, Juliet·2016·New Labor Forum

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1095796016661511

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An oversupply of labor in the global data work industry is continually leveraged to make mobilization feel risky or futile, reinforced by threats of retaliation or relocation.

    “An oversupply of labor within the global data work industry is continually leveraged to make mobilization feel risky or futile [139], reinforced by threats of retaliation or relocation.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Webster, J.
Corresponding author
Webster, Juliet
Venue
New Labor Forum
Published
2016-08-19
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
56-64
ISSN
  • 1095-7960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-2978
OpenAlex
W2502499658
Cited by
116
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
19.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Labor Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Keywords
microwork, gig economy, platform work, digital labor, precarious employment, online labour platforms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review