Predictors of Sustainability of Social Programs
Abstract
This article presents the findings of a large scale study that tested a comprehensive model of predictors of three manifestations of sustainability: continuation, institutionalization, and duration. Based on the literature the predictors were arrayed in four groups: variables pertaining to the project, the auspice organization, the community, and the main funder. The total sample consisted of 197 projects. Informants were asked to fill out a detailed questionnaire, pertaining to the predictor and outcome variables. The findings show both a different model of predictors for each manifestation of sustainability and commonalities among them. Both financial and human factors were involved in all the manifestations of sustainability. Of the financial factors, diversity of funding sources was the most prominent. Of the human factors, the findings highlight the strong role played by the auspice organization’s management and by the main initial funder.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical research shows the presence of internal and external champions, supporters, and advocates influences program sustainment.
“Empirical research also shows that the presence of internal and external champions, supporters, and advocates influences program sustainment [26, 51–53]”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 61
- Authors
- Savaya, R., & Spiro, S. E.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Savaya, Riki
- ORCID
- Savaya, Riki
- Venue
- American Journal of Evaluation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-05-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-43
- ISSN
- 1098-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-0878
- OpenAlex
- W2014634873
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Evaluation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
- Keywords
- program sustainability, social programs, program continuation, institutionalization, program duration, funding sources, program management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review