Cited by 68Gastrointestinal motility and disordersChild Abuse and TraumaPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Is childhood abuse or neglect associated with symptom reports and physiological measures in women with irritable bowel syndrome?

Open access
Heitkemper, Margaret M., Cain, Kevin C., Burr, Robert L., Jun, Sang-Eun, Jarrett, Monica E.·2011·Biological Research For Nursing

Abstract

Purpose. Early childhood traumatic experiences (e.g., abuse or neglect) may contribute to sleep disturbances as well as to other indicators of arousal in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This study compared women with IBS positive for a history of childhood abuse and/or neglect to women with IBS without this history on daily gastrointestinal (GI), sleep, somatic, and psychological symptom distress, polysomnographic sleep, urine catecholamines (CAs) and cortisol, and nocturnal heart rate variability (HRV). Methods. Adult women with IBS recruited from the community were divided into two groups: 21 with abuse/neglect and 19 without abuse/neglect based on responses to the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ; physical, emotional, sexual abuse, or neglect). Women were interviewed, maintained a 30-day symptom diary, and slept in a sleep laboratory. Polysomnographic and nocturnal HRV data were obtained. First-voided urine samples were assayed for cortisol and CA levels. Results. Women with IBS positive for abuse/neglect history were older than women without this history. Among GI symptoms, only heartburn and nausea were significantly higher in women with abuse/neglect. Sleep, somatic, and psychological symptoms were significantly higher in women in the abuse/neglect group. With the exception of percentage of time in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, there were few differences in sleep-stage variables and urine hormone levels. Mean heart rate interval and the natural log of the standard deviation of RR intervals for the entire sleep interval (Ln SDNN) values were lower in those who experienced childhood abuse/neglect. Conclusion. Women with IBS who self-report childhood abuse/neglect are more likely to report disturbed sleep, somatic symptoms, and psychological distress. Women with IBS should be screened for adverse childhood events including abuse/neglect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1099800410393274

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and a history of abuse/neglect had higher REM% sleep than women without abuse/neglect, either with or without IBS; groups did not differ on other PSG measures.

    “In one study (179), women with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and a history of abuse/neglect had higher REM% sleep than did women without abuse/neglect, either with or without IBS; groups did not differ on other PSG measures.”

    From The Stress Acceleration Hypothesis of Nightmares (2017) · cites this paper as [179]

    The Results (Sleep PSG; page unavailable) report higher REM sleep percentage in women with IBS and abuse/neglect than in women with IBS without that history, with little difference in other objective sleep measures. The Methods (Design; page unavailable) confirm that a healthy group without abuse/neglect was included, but the available results do not explicitly establish the claimed REM comparison with that group. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 68

Authors
Heitkemper, M. M., Cain, K. C., Burr, R. L., Jun, S.-E., & Jarrett, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Heitkemper, Margaret M.
Venue
Biological Research For Nursing
Published
2010-12-30
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
399-408
ISSN
  • 1099-8004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4175
OpenAlex
W2043527098
Cited by
68
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Research For Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • KUMeL Repository (Keimyung University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (P30NR004001, NIH NR01094, P30-NR04001, R01NR001094)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
childhood abuse, child neglect, irritable bowel syndrome, women, sleep disorders, heart rate variability, urinary catecholamines, cortisol, psychological distress, somatic symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, adverse childhood experiences, trauma screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep Wake Disorders, Polysomnography, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review