Talanoa: Tongan epistemology and Indigenous research method
Abstract
Story dialogue known as talanoa is increasingly finding its place as a Pacific research method. The authors situate talanoa as an Indigenous concept of relationally mindful critical oratory. Approaching talanoa from mostly a Tongan lens, it is argued that it can contribute to broader discussions of Indigenous research methods and epistemology. The authors address the talanoa literature that has defined it as an open or informal discussion, and respond to questions that have emerged from challenges in implementing it practically in academic research. Indigenous Oceanic thought is used to interpret talanoa as a mediation between relations of Mana (potency), Tapu ( sacred/restrictions), and Noa (equilibrium), which is a gap in the talanoa literature. Talanoa is grounded as a continuum of Indigenous knowledge production and wisdom present from the past that is adaptable to research settings. Centring Moana (Oceanic) epistemology in talanoa challenges dominant research methods to adapt to Indigenous paradigms, rather than attempting to Indigenize a Western one.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Authenticity and actionability of qualitative findings is enhanced when talanoa and fa'afaletui are engaged in the analysis process.
“Building on talanoa as relationally mindful critical oratory (Tecun et al., 2018) for the purposes of data collection, we contend that authenticity and actionability of qualitative findings is enhanced when talanoa and fa ' afaletui are engaged in the analysis process.”
From Decolonising Qualitative Analysis: Collectively Weaving Understanding Using Talanoa and Fa'afaletui Pacific-Indigenous Research Methods (2024) · cites this paper as Tecun et al., 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- Tecun (Daniel Hernandez), A., Hafoka, ‘., ‘Ulu‘ave, L., & ‘Ulu‘ave-Hafoka, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Auckland, New Zealand
- University of California, USA
- Glendale, Utah, USA
- ORCID
- Hafoka, ‘Inoke
- Venue
- AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-04-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 156-163
- ISSN
- 1174-1740 (ISSN-L)
- 1177-1801
- OpenAlex
- W2796990361
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- talanoa, Indigenous research methods, indigenous knowledge production, mana, tapu, NOνA
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review