Advances in Soil Stabilization Using Calcium Carbide Residue (CCR) and Industrial by-Products: A Circular Economy Approach to Enhancing Mechanical Performance
Open accessAbstract
This state-of-the-art review synthesizes recent advances in soil stabilization using calcium carbide residue (CCR) combined with selected industrial by-products, including fly ash, lime, rice husk ash (RHA), and polypropylene fibers, with a focus on applications in road engineering. While CCR alone can improve unconfined compressive strength (UCS) to approximately 0.5 MPa at 28 days, its performance is often constrained by shrinkage cracking, moisture sensitivity, and potential environmental concerns. The reviewed literature indicates that hybrid CCR-based systems can substantially enhance mechanical performance and durability: CCR–fly ash blends have been reported to achieve UCS values exceeding 3.0 MPa with high strength retention under wet–dry cycling; CCR–RHA mixtures significantly reduce swelling potential; and fiber-reinforced formulations improve tensile resistance and crack control under dynamic loading. These performance trends are commonly attributed to combined effects associated with pozzolanic reactions forming calcium silicate and aluminate hydrates (C–S–H and C–A–H), matrix densification, and fiber-induced crack-bridging mechanisms, although quantitative isolation of individual component contributions remains limited in existing studies. The review further highlights performance-oriented mix design strategies, microstructural characterization approaches (e.g. SEM and XRD), and curing considerations relevant to long-term stability. Emerging data-driven and machine-learning-based predictive models are also discussed as promising tools for optimizing CCR-based formulations across diverse soil types and climatic conditions. Overall, CCR-based composite stabilization systems demonstrate strong potential as sustainable alternatives to conventional cement–lime treatments, consistent with circular economy principles, while continued field validation and long-term assessment remain essential for widespread implementation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51
- Authors
- Motalib, J., Lorenzo, G., Sumagayan, M., & Mangorsi, R.
- Affiliations
- Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology (PH)
- Mindanao State University (PH)
- Corresponding author
- Motalib, Jalaloden
- Venue
- Air, Soil and Water Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2026-06
- Volume
- 19
- ISSN
- 1178-6221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7214497714
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Air Soil and Water Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- soil stabilization, calcium carbide residue, industrial by-products, fly ash, rice husk ash, polypropylene fibers, unconfined compressive strength, pozzolanic reaction, shrinkage cracking, moisture sensitivity, wet-dry cycling, fiber-reinforced soil, highway engineering, circular economy, concrete mix design, machine learning prediction models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review