Motivation to study music in Australian schools: the impact of music learning, gender, and socio-economic status
Abstract
This study extends an eight-country mapping exercise (McPherson & O’Neill, 2010; see Research Studies in Music Education issues 2010–2011) to include students’ motivation to study music within the Australian context. It sought to determine whether music learners (students learning an instrument or voice), might be more motivated to study academic subjects at school, and whether gender and socio-economic status (SES) affected student motivation to learn music at school. A total of 2,727 students from grades 5 to 12 completed a questionnaire based on Eccles and Wigfield’s expectancy-value framework. Data collected included: ratings of competence beliefs, interest, importance, usefulness and difficulty for music, English, maths, and science; indications of whether the students were currently learning a musical instrument or voice (music learners); and whether they would like to if given the opportunity. There was an overall significant decline in competence beliefs, interest, importance, and usefulness across the school years, in contrast with increased task difficulty ratings across the school years. Music learners reported significantly higher competence beliefs, interest, importance, usefulness, and less task difficulty than non-music learners. This advantage applied across all school grades for music, competence beliefs for English in upper primary and lower secondary school grades, and for maths in lower secondary grades. Although females reported music as more important and useful than males, their competence beliefs and task difficulty ratings were equivalent. Music was considered slightly less interesting for females than for males. The value of music as a subject declined significantly for upper SES students from upper primary to lower secondary schools. The greatest number of participants (40.8%) who expressed a desire to learn a musical instrument came from the lower SES category in upper primary school. This is an important result in the Australian context, indicating that this may be a positive time to recruit learners. This study provides new information regarding the relationship between motivation and desire to learn a musical instrument across school grades, gender, and socio-economic factors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disparities in cultural capital impact students' musical engagement; students from economically developed areas possess more stable engagement habits due to systematic investments in arts education, while those in resource-limited environments face challenges that inhibit interest.
“Bourdieu's habitus underscores that disparities in cultural capital impact students’ musical engagemen. Students from economically developed areas possess more stable engagement habits due to systematic investments in arts education. In contrast, those in resource-limited environments face challenges that inhibit interest [10,42].”
From Attitudes and Behaviors toward traditional music among Chinese students: the role of individual, family, and school factors (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
Developed areas exhibited stronger institutional frameworks that support music education, while disadvantaged regions lack the necessary infrastructure.
“Developed areas exhibited stronger institutional frameworks that support music education, while disadvantaged regions lack the necessary infrastructure [42].”
From Attitudes and Behaviors toward traditional music among Chinese students: the role of individual, family, and school factors (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
Gender socialization influences musical participation.
“This aligns with previous studies indicating that gender socialization influences musical participation [42].”
From Attitudes and Behaviors toward traditional music among Chinese students: the role of individual, family, and school factors (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
Profiles and portfolios of adolescent school‐based extracurricular activity participation
Feldman, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2007) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.03.004 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Luo, N., & Guan, T. (2025) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/00224294241257154 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- McPherson, G. E., Osborne, M. S., Barrett, M. S., Davidson, J. W., & Faulkner, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Osborne, Margaret S.
- Venue
- Research Studies in Music Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-08-27
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-160
- ISSN
- 1321-103X (ISSN-L)
- 1834-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2286208430
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 114.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research Studies in Music Education (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- music learning motivation, music education, competence beliefs, gender differences, socioeconomic status, academic motivation, musical instrument learning, task difficulty, interest in music, Australian schools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review