Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Emplaced Cartographies: Reconceptualising Camera Phone Practices in an Age of Locative Media

Pink, Sarah, Hjorth, Larissa·2012·Media International Australia

Abstract

In the context of the increased use of high-quality camera phones, along with the growth in distribution services via social and locative media, we are witnessing new forms of visuality emerging. These new types of ‘co-present’ visuality overlay and interweave online and offline cartographies in different ways – maps that require a revision of ethnography. In this article, we frame this phenomenon as a shift from networked visuality to emplaced visuality and sociality. That is, we reflect upon previous models deployed in mobile communication and depart from them to consider how a phenomenological approach – rooted in visual and multisensorial ethnography – might help provide insight into this dynamic media cartography and the socialities associated with it.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1329878x1214500116

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1007/s00779-005-0052-5 · DOI
  2. Burgess J.E., 2008, The VideoVortex, 101
  3. Casey E., 1996, Senses of Place, 13
  4. Chesher C., 2012, Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone, 98
  5. 10.1068/d11407 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/1461444809350900 · DOI
  7. Goggin G., 2011, Global Mobile Media
  8. Cruz E. Gómez, 2012, Sobre la fotografía (digital). Una etnografía
  9. 10.1080/10304310701269107 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/10304310701278140 · DOI
  11. 10.4324/9780203584330 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/10304312.2012.706459 · DOI
  13. 10.4324/9780203127711 · DOI
  14. Holland P., 2004, Photography: A Critical Introduction
  15. 10.1068/a40156 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1469-8676.2011.00165.x · DOI
  17. Ito M., 2003, Japan Media Review
  18. Ito M., 2006, Mobile Communication in Everyday Life: An Ethnographic View, 79
  19. Koskinen I., 2007, The Social Construction and Usage of Communication Technologies: European and Asian Experiences, 48
  20. 10.1080/1472586X.2011.548485 · DOI
  21. Lee D.-H., 2005, Fibreculture
  22. Lee D.-H., 2009, Mobile Technologies, 235
  23. 10.1007/s12130-009-9081-0 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1191/0309132505ph531pr · DOI
  25. 10.1515/9781400831562 · DOI
  26. Massey D., 2005, For Space
  27. Petersen S. Mørk 2009, ‘Common Banality: The Affective Character of Photo Sharing, Everyday Life and Produsage Cultures’, PhD thesis, ITU Copenhagen
  28. Palmer D., 2012, Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone, 85
  29. 10.4135/9781446249383 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/1472586X.2011.548484 · DOI
  31. Pink S., 2012, Situating Everyday Life
  32. 10.1080/17540760701785842 · DOI
  33. Stafford B.M., 2011, A Field Guide to a New Meta-Field: Bridging the Humanities–Neuroscience Divide
  34. 10.4324/9780203946565 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/1472586X.2011.548486 · DOI
  36. Wallis C., 2011, Mobile Communication: Bringing Us Together and Tearing Us Apart, 61

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pink, S., & Hjorth, L.
Venue
Media International Australia
Published
2012-11
Volume
145
Issue
1
Pages
145-155
ISSN
  • 1329-878X
  • 2200-467X
Cited by
64
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review