Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘Show Me Your Slugune and I'll Let You Have the Firstlook’: Some Thoughts on Today's Digital Screenwriting Tools and Aprs

Batty, Craig·2014·Media International Australia

Abstract

Today's market is inundated with digital screenwriting tools and apps. From the introduction of formatting software that promised to give writers access to industry standard screenplay layout (Final Draft, Celtx) comes an era in which technologists are seeking to influence screenwriting practice itself (Scrivener, Slugline, Plotbot, StorySkeleton). Although perhaps not as explicit in their claims of success as the plethora of seminars by screenwriting ‘gurus’, digital tools and apps do in some ways promise a range of solutions to everyday screenwriting problems, at the very least by assuring users that they will help manage the logistics that often get in the way of creativity. But what do these digital interventions actually do? Do they shape creative practice, or merely provide tools to format a screenwriter's existing ideas? Do they help the writing process, or the processing of writing? This article examines some of the digital screenwriting tools and apps on the current market, and examines what they offer script development and writing practice. By reflecting on my own involvement in an online screenplay assessment platform, the article also suggests how embracing pedagogical aspects of screenwriting might give digital tools and apps the opportunity to help shape creative practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1329878x1415300114

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Batty C., 2014, Screenwriters and Screenwriting: Putting Practice into Context, 1
  2. Batty C., 2010, Media Writing: A Practical Introduction
  3. 10.4324/9780203143711 · doi:10.4324/9780203143711
  4. 10.1057/9781137338938_2 · doi:10.1057/9781137338938_2
  5. Field S., 1994, Screenplay: The Foundations of Screenwriting
  6. Ganz A., 2011, Analysing the Screenplay, 142
  7. 10.1007/978-1-137-06114-0 · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-06114-0
  8. 10.1057/9780230392298 · DOI
  9. Maras S., 2009, Screenwriting: History, Theory and Practice
  10. McKie S., 2007, Semantic Media Adaptation and Personalization, Second International Workshop, 221
  11. 10.1386/josc.1.1.11/1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Price S., 2014, A History of the Screenplay
  13. Price S., 2010, The Screenplay: Authorship, Theory and Criticism
  14. Readman M., 2011, Media Education Research Journal, 2, 57
  15. 10.1057/9781137288417 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Scher L., 2011, Reading Screenplays: How to Analyse and Evaluate Film Scripts
  17. 10.1386/josc.5.1.85_1 · doi:10.1386/josc.5.1.85_1
  18. Trottier D., 2010, The Screenwriter's Bible: A Complete Guide to Writing, Formatting, and Selling Your Script
  19. Waldeback Z., 2012, The Creative Screenwriter: Exercises to Expand Your Craft
  20. Wells P., 2010, Analysing the Screenplay, 104

Metadata

Authors
Batty, C.
Venue
Media International Australia
Published
2014-11
Volume
153
Issue
1
Pages
118-127
ISSN
  • 1329-878X
  • 2200-467X
Cited by
2
References
1
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Show Me Your Slugune and I'll Let You Have the Firstlook’: Some Thoughts on Today's Digital Screenwriting Tools and Aprs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1329878x1415300114
The paper
Batty, C. (2014). ‘Show Me Your Slugune and I'll Let You Have the Firstlook’: Some Thoughts on Today's Digital Screenwriting Tools and Aprs. Media International Australia. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x1415300114

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.