The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Advancing Gender Equity in Organizations: The Challenge and Importance of Maintaining a Gender Narrative
Abstract
Building on Coleman and Rippin's analysis of how the methodological approach we took in this project made it difficult for us to keep gender equity a primary goal of our organizational change efforts, we reflect on how our conceptual approach to gender, described in the Meyerson and Kolb paper, exacerbated this problem. We explore the consequences of losing the gender focus of our work for our ability to make meaningful change in organizations. Finally, we describe how we have developed our approach to organizational change so as to maintain our focus on gender as a basis of our critique and gender equity as an objective of our intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploring the Gaps between Meanings and Practices of Gender Equity in a Sport Organization
Hoeber, L. (2007) · Gender, Work & Organization · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00342.x · Cited by 104
Gender Equity for Athletes: Multiple Understandings of an Organizational Value
Hoeber, L. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9320-3 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E.
- Venue
- Organization
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 589-608
- ISSN
- 1350-5084 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7323
- OpenAlex
- W2048954600
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advancing Gender Equity in Organizations: The Challenge and Importance of Maintaining a Gender Narrative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/135050840074005
- The paper
- Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Advancing Gender Equity in Organizations: The Challenge and Importance of Maintaining a Gender Narrative. Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840074005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
