Cited by 40Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPolyomavirus and related diseases

Application of the 2010 McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in a Spanish cohort of patients with clinically isolated syndromes

Gómez-Moreno, M, Díaz-Sánchez, M, Ramos-González, A·2012·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Background Recently the International Panel on Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has proposed new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria for the diagnosis of MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes (CIS). We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of these new criteria for lesions dissemination in space (DIS) and time (DIT), from a single MRI scan, to predict conversion from CIS to clinically definite MS. Methods We studied 67 CIS patients with baseline MRI performed within the first 3 months after onset. The follow-up was of at least 24 months. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Barkhof-Tintoré criteria and the new proposed MRI criteria for DIS and DIT were calculated with SPSS v.15.0. Results The mean age for clinical onset was 30 years and 64% of patients were female. The overall conversion rate was 74%. In our cohort, Barkhof-Tintoré criteria showed a sensitivity of 71.43%, a specificity of 66.67%, with an accuracy of 73.1%. New DIS criteria showed a sensitivity of 85.71%, a specificity of 64.71% and an accuracy of 80.30%. We also evaluated the new DIT criteria with a single MRI scan in 54 patients with baseline scans that included gadolinium-enhanced images. The sensitivity of the test was 52.63% with a specificity of 75.00% and an accuracy of 59.26%. Conclusion New DIS criteria are simpler and more sensitive than previous criteria. The sensitivity of DIT criterion using a single MRI scan was rather low, as other previous studies showed, reflecting its s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1352458511417828

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional studies concerning the applicability of the 2010 McDonald Criteria in Asian, Middle Eastern, and Latin American populations have been published since 2010, though tended to be small.

    “Additional studies concerning the applicability of the 2010 McDonald Criteria in Asian, 22-24 Middle Eastern, 25,26 and Latin American 27 populations have been published since 2010, though tended to be small.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gómez-Moreno, M., Díaz-Sánchez, M., & Ramos-González, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurology, University Hospital Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES)
  • Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2011-08-24
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
39-44
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2127304332
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, clinically isolated syndrome, McDonald criteria, MRI diagnosis, dissemination in space, dissemination in time, conversion to multiple sclerosis, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spain, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review