Cited by 43Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Single Test to ARrive at Multiple Sclerosis (STAR-MS) diagnosis: A prospective pilot study assessing the accuracy of the central vein sign in predicting multiple sclerosis in cases of diagnostic uncertainty

Open access
Clarke, Margareta A, Samaraweera, Amal PR, Falah, Yasser, Pitiot, Alain, Allen, Christopher M, Dineen, Robert A, Tench, Chris R, Morgan, Paul S +1 more·2020·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Background: Misdiagnosis is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) as a proportion of patients present with atypical clinical/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. The central vein sign has the potential to be a non-invasive, MS-specific biomarker. Objective: To test the accuracy of the central vein sign in predicting a diagnosis of MS in patients with diagnostic uncertainty at disease presentation using T2*-weighted, 3 T MRI. Methods: In this prospective pilot study, we recruited individuals with symptoms unusual for MS but with brain MRI consistent with the disease, and those with a typical clinical presentation of MS whose MRI did not suggest MS. We calculated the proportion of lesions with central veins for each patient and compared the results to the eventual clinical diagnoses. The optimal central vein threshold for diagnosis was established. Results: Thirty-eight patients were scanned, 35 of whom have received a clinical diagnosis. Median percentage of lesions with central veins was 51% in MS and 28% in non-MS. A threshold of 40.7% lesions with central veins resulted in 100% sensitivity and 73.9% specificity. Conclusion: The central vein sign assessed with a clinically available T2* scan can successfully diagnose MS in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. The central vein sign should be considered as a diagnostic biomarker in MS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1352458519882282

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a recent prospective pilot study evaluating an emerging MRI diagnostic biomarker for MS ('central vein sign') in patients with diagnostic uncertainty, three out of 23 (13%) patients who did not have MS had FND or functional sensory symptoms.

    “Lastly, in a recent prospective pilot study evaluating an emerging MRI diagnostic biomarker for MS (“central vein sign”) in patients with diagnostic uncertainty, three out of 23 (13%) patients who did not have MS had FND or functional sensory symptoms [28].”

Authors
Clarke, M. A., Samaraweera, A. P., Falah, Y., Pitiot, A., Allen, C. M., Dineen, R. A., Tench, C. R., Morgan, P. S., & Evangelou, N.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Laboratory of Image & Data Analysis, Ilixa Ltd., Nottingham, UK
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2019-10-31
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
433-441
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2984030614
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Nottingham Hospitals Charity (PP-N EVANGELOU-NOV 2014)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, central vein sign, diagnostic uncertainty, T2-weighted MRI, diagnostic biomarkers, misdiagnosis, brain lesions, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cerebral Veins, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Pilot Projects, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Uncertainty, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review